Gus Landt wrote:OK, I finally broke down and decided I need the cash. I'm listing my last white box. It is a 5th print, and it is beautiful!http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... 8737144875Also, all of the sups, in excellent condition, will be going up in the next 30 minutes (all seperate auctions).
Gus Landt wrote:This is a '5th printing' of the original rules and came out in 1975-1976
harami2000 wrote:Gus Landt wrote:OK, I finally broke down and decided I need the cash. I'm listing my last white box. It is a 5th print, and it is beautiful!http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... 8737144875Also, all of the sups, in excellent condition, will be going up in the next 30 minutes (all seperate auctions).Gus; any idea whether those supps. were just "in the same box" or purchased at the same time?thx ^^[edit]*meh* Just saw the Eldritch go up... Getting way too late, that Gus Landt wrote:This is a '5th printing' of the original rules and came out in 1975-1976
Gus Landt wrote:harami2000 wrote:Sups were purchased seperately. Why the rolly eyes on my 'Fifth Printing'? The only dates in the box say 1974, and the Acaeum says that makes it a 1975-1976 fifth printing. Can't tell which of those years it was from. Not that I woulnd't have found a way to work all thoose years into the description, mind you! But in this case it is legit keywording IMHO.
harami2000 wrote:
deimos3428 wrote:Gus Landt wrote:Sups were purchased seperately. Why the rolly eyes on my 'Fifth Printing'? The only dates in the box say 1974, and the Acaeum says that makes it a 1975-1976 fifth printing. Can't tell which of those years it was from. Not that I woulnd't have found a way to work all thoose years into the description, mind you! But in this case it is legit keywording IMHO. Whenever Harami uses rolly eyes, especially if OD&D is involved, check to see if there is a date in the sentence he quoted. I'm guessing the Acaeum description is wrong. I'd have to go hunting through the newer research threads he's started, but I'm guessing 5ths were slightly later than that.
Gus Landt wrote:Sups were purchased seperately. Why the rolly eyes on my 'Fifth Printing'? The only dates in the box say 1974, and the Acaeum says that makes it a 1975-1976 fifth printing. Can't tell which of those years it was from. Not that I woulnd't have found a way to work all thoose years into the description, mind you! But in this case it is legit keywording IMHO.
harami2000 wrote:5th = Mid 1976 - Late 1977, yes, afaik.1975-76 (Dec 75 - Apr 76) is impossible
Gus Landt wrote:Any idea how come the Acaeum lists "Fifth (Dec 1975 - Apr 1976)"? That is all I was going by, and hadn't read anywhere else to the contrary.
afoolandhis$ wrote:Any last-minute guesses as to what the 3rd print woody will go for?$575?
Deadlord36 wrote:I e-mailed the 94.4, np Paypal seller. He;s a chump, tries to say his feedbacks are all retaliatory for buyer non-payments, blah blah blah, but if you read them he is flat-out lying, since he left good feedback for buyers and never shipped the items. Bad attitude as well. Bidding on this one is crazy, no way to cover your ass.
harami2000 wrote:afoolandhis$ wrote:Any last-minute guesses as to what the 3rd print woody will go for?$575?Sounds like a relatively sane amount to me. Would've been more like $400-425 last year; faults, yet still presentable.Will see... ^^
harami2000 wrote:Heh. If I said I input a max of $586.16 about four days ago... (np)Oh well, I need the box and ref sheets....
afoolandhis$ wrote:harami2000 wrote:Heh. If I said I input a max of $586.16 about four days ago... (np)Oh well, I need the box and ref sheets.... Congrats, David! Money well spent, in my opinion.