Mars wrote:As it stands this seems to be the most rare of all D&D items (rarer than any tournament module, prepub, woodgrain set, etc) and in comparison it is not that old.
Aneoth wrote:I seriously doubt that any but completists would bid for a Jade Hare over even a third print woodie. Same for any of the Pre-Pubs and tourney modules and many other rare D&D items as well. And as stated above, I would also jump all over a full set of Aussies (SW or not) over a Covered Jade Hare.... ANY TIME.That useless cover does absolutely NOTHING for me as a collector and it most certainly adds NOTHING for playablity of Jade Hare, while the aussies do a lot for me as a collector and they can be played. The same goes for ALL of the other so called common rares you listed above.
Sir Kill Alot wrote:To keep this from distilling into a flame war, I'll just agree that we disagree on these points.What it really comes down to is personal choice {like everything in the collecting world...One man's trash is another's treasure}. I am trying not to speak for anyone else here, but I would imagine that you are probably in the minority with your views.-Len
Aneoth wrote:...And as you said One man's trash is another's treasure. I totally agree there. (BUT I do NOT think the Covered Jade Hare is trash though)
Sir Kill Alot wrote:Aneoth, Sorry for not being clearer...I wasn't suggesting you thought it was trash. It was just a figure of speech.-Len
deimos3428 wrote:Bah. With or without the cover, Jade Hare is a bit of dreck that should never have seen print.