Baskii wrote:The covers are heavily scuffed and faded, however.
sauromatian wrote:I wonder why that is? Slightly earlier than usual printings [without ISBNs on the spines] are always heavily worn, while the ones printed just a little later are usually rock-solid after decades of use.Were the buyers of the late 70s really so much more hardcore at using them for games, or was the quality of ink & cardboard just a little inferior than later?
Baskii wrote:I have what I believe to be early printings of the Players Handbook and Dungeon Masters Guide, and I'm interested to know what their value might be - and of course if anyone would be interested!
deimos3428 wrote: . . . I've taken an early DMG apart (a fourth) -- and it's a struggle of titanic proportion. The thing is both stitched and stapled together, with glue on the spine for good measure. It doesn't actually require a spine to stay in one piece!
PM-Knight wrote:Hey Deimos,Have you had a chance to perform any microscopic surgeries on that poor 4th edition creature that you dismembered ??? Any further findings?Thanks,