Ralf Toth wrote:Would it not make sense that owners submit (anonymously or with their names on it), the titles and additional details (authors, convention played at, two-sentence summary of the content, maybe even pictures) to Scott and he presents this in a tournament module section of the Acaeum?Of course, the term "tournament module" would have to be defined for submission process. It seems the "usual suspects" have some knowledge on them. Why not share? OK, it need not be with pictures. Just an information, so that the rest of us knows, these items exist.Or do tournament modules not fit in the Acaeum scheme?
Ralf Toth wrote:It seems the "usual suspects" have some knowledge on them. Why not share? OK, it need not be with pictures. Just an information, so that the rest of us knows, these items exist.
Or do tournament modules not fit in the Acaeum scheme?
dathon wrote:Yes, I've thought the same thing recently that Deadlord said about someone submitting their own work as an old tourney. How could any of this really be verified? Someone could even claim the tourney was a Gen Con D&D event and how would we know? Does anyone have all the Gen Con programs to verify at least the title?
grodog wrote:While I don't have all of them, I do have a lot of programs as .pdf's, provided by Randy Porter (mentioned above; he provided them to help my tourney research, in exchange for scans of all of my GenCon badges from over the years). I'm sure other folks have more complete GenCon program collections, though, but I'd be happy to try to help someone authenticate a tourney if they had questions.
grodog wrote:Of course they do Shane
a2jeff wrote:Based on these themes, and the price paid for these at ~$125 per module, does anyone have any others that meet the three points above that they would part with at $125?
grodog wrote:Sounds like a good Distributed Acaeum project to me.