Plaag wrote:http://www.acaeum.com/jg/IndexbySystemTEST.htmlThoughts on this.ShaneG.
killjoy32 wrote:shanei like it...BUT.... only problem you gonna have is the items with multiple prints. anyone looking at that, is for instance, gonna think their 5th print Tegel is worth X... know what i mean?so therefore, you might need to expand, so it coincides with your product prints too.Al
IttyBitty wrote:Very nice, I like it...
killjoy32 wrote:oh shanewhen you finish it off from a perspective of a prints etc, i have some data i can put on it that will get us all started and give us all summit to talk about.Alps. will need an excel spreadsheet with which to enter data tho if poss...
lucyjoyce wrote:Wow, Shane. I can't imagine how many hours that took! Thanks so much. I have just begun learning about JG stuff. You make it so easy for me. I really appreciate it.
aia wrote:well, it looks great just like the other pages of the acaeum... but i must agree with al: you'd think that the detail you prepared should be expanded (only for certain items!) with the print reference... hence, why dont you preprare a page with all the sub categories (d&d, ad&d, sci-fi items and so on...) as an overall page with a simple index and afterwards, a single page for each sub-category?keep on working on that! it's really great! ciaooo
killjoy32 wrote:i think it only need the prints expanded on so that you can put relative values and rarity levels to each one. i dont think sub categories are really necessary. you dont want to clutter up a great idea with too many menus. i think its pretty obvious when you look at an item, what type of genre it is for...... and i still like the JG ref system the best. its always the one i look at anyway.Al
improvstone wrote:By the way, in Aussie speak, Shane you're a bloody legend!