killjoy32 wrote:i just checked, i have 3, 4, 5, 7, 8....well it will give me something to do looking for the other 3 Al
Is that a mailed copy of #7, btw? Don't remember seeing those seal tabs before.
As to absolute rarity, 1st print #1 should still be the most elusive, I'm sure.
invincibleoverlord wrote:I was just back looking at the Dungeoneer page, and I think the picture describing a 3rd print should be the 1st. The copy without a stated #1, "Dungeoneer" inside a drooping banner like above, and postmarked June 76 would seem to be the 1st print given the early date.
invincibleoverlord wrote:The pic for the stated 2nd print (below) appears to say July -- August 76? Or is that 77? With "reprint" written below? It's hard to tell. What's your's say David?
invincibleoverlord wrote:To further my theory, it appears the typeset for the reprinted issue 1 came from the "Dungeoneer" heading format from issue 2.
What does "tan" look like to you, Mike?!
invincibleoverlord wrote:Thoughts?
IO: Your mailed #7 include the letter?
Judges Guild detectives are at it again, this is a return to the 'older days'
@IO: Would I be correct in guessing that there's no "SB02MAU013" written on that copy of #1, above?
i.e. That it was either purchased in advance or sent out as a freebie single issue to Mr.(?) Mauzey and their actual subscription started from issue #2. Ditto for Tadashi's.
Having dug out #5 & 6 here, #5 has "SB05WAGN103": i.e. not picking up subscribers at a huge rate if I read that correctly and difficult to explain "over 200" by #6 save through the number of new subscribers that may have been accumulating whilst that issue was busy being late... Mailing date for #5: July 30, 1977 #6: Dec 22, 1977 (same recipient, no subscriber code) Check?