harami2000 wrote:(Compared with the almost stand-alone nature of Characters Checklist . Was your copy definitely with a Red Tegel?).
harami2000 wrote:=oh, and 2,445, btw damn.... too late! ^^
killjoy32 wrote:harami2000 wrote:(Compared with the almost stand-alone nature of Characters Checklist . Was your copy definitely with a Red Tegel?). yup. have got three with the same with each. and some spare books too. ya know, i should spend my money on more useful things
killjoy32 wrote:2445?what you on about? you on some strange scottish brew
harami2000 wrote:All of those sheets with the red Tegels having the same difference in fonts/copyright message on #29, then?Well that makes things interesting, if so; trying to figure out where the copies Shane and I have, come from! (Presuming that sheet was not available prior to "L" )
Plaag wrote:Anyhow..yeah scans would work too, but can't do it at this time of night...
Plaag wrote:..but perhaps I should really do the early ones soon due to all this confusion.
harami2000 wrote:Good clips there, Shane.Plaag wrote:Anyhow..yeah scans would work too, but can't do it at this time of night...What? Only 4am... Plaag wrote:..but perhaps I should really do the early ones soon due to all this confusion.Yes, would certainly give a better grounding for any forward discussion, if required. That explains the confusion re. the Wizard's Guide, for example.thx
Plaag wrote:Site updatedShaneG.
Plaag wrote:Oops..forgot to say the 3rd CC is double sided on that page (now corrected)..and may take that idea to specify which CCs came with what after some more tegels have been looked over.ShaneG.