harami2000 wrote:Plaag wrote:Site has been updated..which I hope to do every weeken.... for the rest of your life... *g*. sry ^^==What's up with this unilateral "interpretation according to Shane" business?If, rather than discussing what evidence you are using for having done what you've done at several points, you're not going to bother replying to my emails/PMs, please pull my name from every location it appears. Thanks
Plaag wrote:Site has been updated..which I hope to do every weeken.
Plaag wrote:Well Journal J (Dec 1976/Jan 1977) states in Booty List:14. Ready Ref Package (20 pages of seven different charts)price to be announced later.Journal K (Feb/Mar 1977) states in Booty List:14. Ready Ref Sheets Package-20 pages of seven different charts published through Installment L2.99Hum..so actually our checklists would be the ones to come with Installment L, and then the reprint of the Ref Sheets would make it into #14ShaneG.
killjoy32 wrote:just e-mailed you with something interesting i have just found.checking the booty list on #12 CSIO, i found that #5 refers to the ready ref sheets in question "with minus armour classes"kinda makes things a lil more interesting again no? Al
killjoy32 wrote:so i still have a 1st then?
harami2000 wrote:Sorry; don't have a #12 to read the context of that note you mention.
killjoy32 wrote:harami2000 wrote:Sorry; don't have a #12 to read the context of that note you mention.david, i e-mailed you and shane a scan of it chummerAl
harami2000 wrote:So that's pretty definitive re. /only/ I-7 having -ve ACs on the "first available" copies.Good. That's the easiest solution! (i.e. as currently listed )(Even if that doesn't definitively pin down the appearance of -ve ACs on I-8 to the 1st JG #14 sheets).Thanks for the cross-check, Al.
killjoy32 wrote:i still think it means negs on each of them but am looking now to see if i can find reference elsewhere. tho i think #10 / #12 is prb the best place to look.Al
harami2000 wrote:Hmm... I'm reading #5 as;"one monster attacking chart [I-7]: [which] has to hit scores (with minus armor classes)".- as opposed to "five men attacking charts [I-8]: [which] has ACS (sic) To Hit scores" (no -ve ACs).Yeah, unless the earliest couple of journals have any other hints... and it's pointless me searching when I know Shane (and others) have those on hand!
killjoy32 wrote:well we will have to agree to disagree there until someone comes up with something, as it doesnt sound clear-cut to me either way.
killjoy32 wrote:well hopefully someone else can shine a little light hopefully?