Deadlord36 wrote:That's all?I know Rood of Parth was never released publicly.
Plaag wrote:Deadlord36 wrote:That's all?I know Rood of Parth was never released publicly.Far from all Would this be a good format to list the products in (see below)?Item Code: Title: (# printing)Type: AccessorySystem: Author(s): Date Published: Format: #-page book, size in inches map, etc(Description here)ShaneG.
mbassoc2003 wrote:Seems like a good format to me. If you standardise your cover scan size and ask for covers in jpeg format, I'm sure there's probably a full between the members of the board.That was a nice 1st CSIO from Toymom. Nearly complete and in good condition. It took me a year to get my copy (David wouldn't sell), but it was worth the wait for the copy I ended up with.
Deadlord36 wrote:Do you mean listing them on eBay?
Plaag wrote:Well with it brought up, would they be better as gif or jpeg?And my thought on size would be either full or a quarter of that, example a module cover would be (8.5" x 11") or (4.25" x 5.5").Do maps have to be only a protion shown or could a full scan though perhaps smaller then full size be allowed?ShaneG.
invincibleoverlord wrote:What's funny is I came across a Booklet I a few years ago that is solid white with black lettering. It is also missing the "Copyright 1976 Judges Guild" text on the front page, the space is just blank. Other than that their identical. It's not a Xerox copy, it's definitely printed, and it came in a sealed JG mailer envelope P.O. marked in mid 76. I don't have it in front of me... so I don't remember the exact post marked month, but (iirc) it's pre October, the date given on the Judges Guild Codex as to when it was mass mailed. And this was in the "1000 to 2200, range" according to the Afterglow website. It's the only one I've ever seen, anyone else have or seen one of these?My guess is that it may be a Pre-Judges-Guild-Journal-Mailer for early members. Because in the envelope there was only the Guideline Booklet I (White), and the CSotIO maps (the four maps are made with a different heavy-stock paper than the two other sets we have from envelopes P.O. marked October 76), and the envelope did not contain Journal # I.
harami2000 wrote:<72 dpi test pic>[ Image ]How well/badly does this color match anyone else's copy or scan?Phps best to stick with 72dpi (barring the maps? ) regardless of actual resolution...Only minimal cropping at the edges, too.
invincibleoverlord wrote:I dug out our JG stuff, and I made a mistake in my above post. The white Initial Guidelines Booklet I, and the four maps that make the CSotIO that I stated came from an envelope pre-dating October 76 was incorrect. That envelope is actually plain and void of any post-marks.
invincibleoverlord wrote:And now with the discovery that the Guideline Booklet and the Maps could have come from that same GenCon in 76 it kind of make sense to me now remembering a few other items I picked up from a seller that tie into the Con that year. I'd but a buck on it for sure.
invincibleoverlord wrote:So two of what most would consider cool but So-So items in a collection (clean city-state maps and odd colored Guideline book I, and incomplete Bob Blake pre-pub) may have just become a few GenCon relics. Nice!
mbassoc2003 wrote:That's real nice David. Could you do the same with the other pages?
Plaag wrote:Saving picture creates one at 198dpi, making that 72dpi changes the color somewhat (little darker). I don't see the color change as to much of an issue, who knows.Oh..and good scan.