killjoy32 wrote:she isnt placing any value on them, the bidders are. but in the mail, she is threatening to pull the auction, but will leave it running for now "to see how it goes"...i mean WTF is that all about?
mbassoc2003 wrote:Yeah, I got the e-mail as well, but I see her point. If someone sent Tegel Manor back to her and got a refund through PayPal, she's got no PoVQ. And she's obviously been advised of its worth.If eBay had asked her to remove the items, she should have just e-mailed bidders directly and asked for private bids. Especially if she already had some on the table.
killjoy32 wrote:my thoughts are if she went off and researched it properly and THEN bumped it all back on seperately, she'd have prb got their proper worth anyway, without all the hassle that "might" come.....
harami2000 wrote:killjoy32 wrote:my thoughts are if she went off and researched it properly and THEN bumped it all back on seperately, she'd have prb got their proper worth anyway, without all the hassle that "might" come.....Had offered days ago, at my expense, with a large deposit and totally "open" to the list, to check it out and return it with my evaluation, fwiw.No interest.
rosenkav wrote:As this is becoming an Acaeum case, I'd be just curious to see a piccie of the packing material that she's so courteously willing to send pictures around...And well, we could persuade her to run the auction here instead in e-bay since the list of the bidders is strangely familiar...
killjoy32 wrote:harami2000 wrote:Had offered days ago, at my expense, with a large deposit and totally "open" to the list, to check it out and return it with my evaluation, fwiw.No interest.very odd really isnt it? oh well ne'mind. my curiousity is aroused now and impulsiveness has kicked in **throws himself into the melee**
harami2000 wrote:Had offered days ago, at my expense, with a large deposit and totally "open" to the list, to check it out and return it with my evaluation, fwiw.No interest.
mbassoc2003 wrote:As regards the board hoasting an auction, the board is a non-commercial enterprise, and I think it should stay that way. Morality aside, we can hardly be an objective and open forum if we are going to trade openly on the floor. This is a place of respite and relaxation for many, lots of us call it home.
harami2000 wrote:mbassoc2003 wrote:So this one's going across the pond is it? Does someone know something about the 'quality' of the packing that they're not sharing? Yes. I've seen the photos.Yeah, but only myself and one other person got the comment about the color of the cover... For good or bad, I really haven't got a clue, to be honest.
mbassoc2003 wrote:So this one's going across the pond is it? Does someone know something about the 'quality' of the packing that they're not sharing? Yes. I've seen the photos.
bclarkie wrote: I must warn everyone that you will only be able to get back what Paypal can recover for you and not 1 penny more . I recently just found this out the hard way on a seller who never delivered the goods.
bclarkie wrote:harami2000 wrote:Yeah, but only myself and one other person got the comment about the color of the cover... For good or bad, I really haven't got a clue, to be honest. I actually made a remark last week about the color of the cover when the first auction was still up. It concerned me because it appeared to be to bright green versus the picture of the 3rd print that we have listed here on the site. No one really addressed my concerns, so I figured that I was just being paranoid. There are certain parts of this auction, that the more I read about it through everyone's comments, that this may just be a very well designed scam . The fact that "bella" was so unwilling to let somebody try to aucthenticate the item for her raises a huge red flag to me. Another thing of note, is the fact that she stated to me that EBay asked her to take the auction down because someone complained about her selling "photocopies". The fact of the matter the people who were bidding on her auction at that time for the most part were members here who were pretty well convinced that the item was authentic despite her photocopy claim. Now, IMO, that means 1 of 2 things. First thing is that some from here did complain hoping the auction would get pulled and hoping to purchase the PotVQ off EBay for a greatly reduced price. The other thing that could be happening is that she is just flat out lying about the whole EBay thing, that she is just planning on taking the money and running away, far away. In lieu of comments here made about charging the items back through Paypal, I must warn everyone that you will only be able to get back what Paypal can recover for you and not 1 penny more . I recently just found this out the hard way on a seller who never delivered the goods.
harami2000 wrote:Yeah, but only myself and one other person got the comment about the color of the cover... For good or bad, I really haven't got a clue, to be honest.
mbassoc2003 wrote:Mine is distinctly bright, almost neon yellow.
mbassoc2003 wrote:I wouldn't be risking £200 on those odds.
johnhuck wrote:But check my feedback score.