Azurah wrote:I haven't run any modules. For some reason, I prefer to come up with my own tangled plots. My favorite highlight so far, though, was the run-away walking tower on chicken legs in the Outlands. If you've read the last page of the Player's Primer to the Outlands, you know what I'm talking about. But anyway, we've done more than enough to write a book. I should.
In my opinion, he didn't have a grasp on the whole flavor of Sigil, and the atmosphere was completely off. It felt more like Ravenloft.
I'm dying to play in a good campaign, though. Have room in yours? ;}
GraysonAC wrote:I've been running one for a few months now, although it's a 3.5 game (Don't shoot!).
Doug Williams wrote:GraysonAC wrote:I've been running one for a few months now, although it's a 3.5 game (Don't shoot!). Has WoTC translated Planescape over to v. 3.0/3.5 yet?
Azurah wrote:Part of me is sad to hear that, and yet... a larger part of me is relieved.Holy crap, Winterwords, your sig made me laugh so hard.
Azurah wrote:That's the spirit! Throw your party into the Hells for a fun little romp! I don't have much experience at all with 1E. Would it be overly difficult to incorporate the setting, or at least the flavor of it, into a 1E campaign?
Azurah wrote:If you're taking them on a trip into hell, I'd say the meat would more be the atmosphere than the rules, anyhow. So I think what you did with the Ravenloft campaign would be a great idea, especially if you're introducing players to new elements. Sounds neat. Bug me for tips anytime. I don't mind. In fact, can I play, too? ;}
solomani wrote:Doug Williams wrote:Has WoTC translated Planescape over to v. 3.0/3.5 yet?Actually PS was one of the settings that made no money. So they wont be brining it back anytime soon. But they did give a group of enthusiasts a free license to convert to 3.5 and add their own content.Welcome to Planewalker | Planewalker
Doug Williams wrote:Has WoTC translated Planescape over to v. 3.0/3.5 yet?