grubbiv wrote:Here's a table with all the DCC printings that I am aware of of.
Rakeesh sah Tarna wrote:good work. three prints for 2 + 51.5 two 1e prints for 12.5 http://www.goodman-games.com/forums/vie ... f=20&t=894http://www.goodman-games.com/forums/vie ... =20&t=2769
simonmwh wrote:I'm snowed under at work atm but will have a go at the wiki end of next week all being well.
mbassoc2003 wrote:There are at least three printings of 12.5 1E that I'm aware of. I have two printings, and I don't have the Gencon first.
bombadil wrote:I'll be putting up one of each of the first two printings, including the GenCon 1st. Should be up later today.
mbassoc2003 wrote:There is a 1/4 inch difference in height between the 2nd and 3rd printing, and a different saturation level on the bue of the interior wraparound map.
grubbiv wrote:Here's a table with all the DCC printings that I am aware of of.I made articles, or at least linked the images simonmwh uploaded, but I don't know the authors, date and cover artist for Chronicle of the Fiend.
PaulKM wrote:Where the best place to find the printing details?
Mars wrote:Are you labeling the copies purchased from Goodman Games after Gencon as 2nd and 3rd printings? Where some copies are noticeably taller than other copies?Is there any evidence that they were printed on different dates? I thought these covers were printed on big sheets and the difference was mainly an issue of uneven cutting.
goodmangames wrote:The first run of the 1E version of DCC #12.5, for Gen Con, was done with a printer I'll call Printer A. Printer A did a decent job on the Gen Con products, and I asked them to do a second run to fulfill the online portion. Printer A delivered that second run in a defective condition. A small portion was salvageable, and went out to fill a limited number of orders, but most of the run was unacceptable. Those copies were destroyed and Printer A promised to deliver replacements. Their replacement run was delivered several weeks later and was largely sub-par as well. At that point I stopped working with Printer A and sent the job to Printer B, who produced the balance of the orders. So there were two printers and a total of four runs involved, if I remember correctly.
JohnGaunt wrote: . . . and the print-run junkies start jonesin' for some 12.5 . . .
Mars wrote:I think we need a solid definition for what we want to define as a print run.