Sardan wrote:Great stuff as usual Richard. Any plans to do kobolds and/or hobgoblins?
otherworld wrote:As for Mind Flayers, I don't plan to do them. There are certain monsters whose IP rights WotC will probably defend vigorously, and the Mind Flayer is one of them.
Sardan wrote:If it is an IP issue how do Reaper get away with their Bathalians?http://www.reapermini.com/FigureFinder#detail/02568
otherworld wrote:A new figure, due for release in late March or early April, 'DM6 - Minotaur'.44m to the eyes (standing on a 40mm base), 4 part casting in metal.
VermilionFire wrote:I don't mean this as a childish question, but does that minotaur have his genitals showing? If so, an interesting sculpting decision considering the prurient background of the Minotaur's origin.
Center_Stage_Hobbies wrote:Not sure if it's the pose or the penis, but it leaves me a little cold.
otherworld wrote:Considering the sordid details of the Cretan Minotaur's conception, surely a bit of nudity isn't too shocking?!
otherworld wrote:Glad you like 'em! As for Mind Flayers, I don't plan to do them. There are certain monsters whose IP rights WotC will probably defend vigorously, and the Mind Flayer is one of them.I just got the green for the new Minotaur, and will post some pics later.
Sardan wrote:Just another thought, Richard. Does this mean that you will not be making an owlbear?
otherworld wrote:No, Jon, I reckon an Owlbear is fair game. The following figures are not subject to the OGL, so I won't be touching them: * beholder * gauth * carrion crawler * displacer beast * githyanki * githzerai * kuo-toa * mind flayer * slaad * umber hulk * yuan-tiWTF is a Gauth?