red_bus wrote:So the 1st print/ed. rulebook predates this by presumably a few years? I never really got into RQ but it would be interesting to see what the really early stuff was like.
stumbling tiger wrote:with Glorantha misspelled as "Glorontha" throughout
stumbling tiger wrote:No idea if the "Ken Rolston" who signed his name on the rulebook [look closely] is The Ken Rolston
sauromatian wrote:...which is pretty interesting considering RQ is supposed to be the system of the highly literate.
red_bus wrote:...pretension for fantasy rpgs runs roughly as follows :Chivalry & Sorcery .................................... (suitable for Big brains only)
red_bus wrote:Tunnels & Trolls
stumbling tiger wrote:Yassa, Massa. Seriously, I've had lots of fun with T&T solo adventures. I'd love to try playing it as a real RPG, but never had a group that was up for it.(screws monocle back on, crooks pinky)And the mechanics have a certain elegant simplicity.
killjoy32 wrote:i always liked a simple straight-forward format
sauromatian wrote:Some C&S, obscure other late-70s stuff, signed:eBay listings