The Robilar wrote:I take it that a lot of folks here want to see this published so that it is usable to some extent in play as well?-snip-We are considering all options so that the Historical/Collector crowd as well as the gaming crowd are satiisfied with the final offering but do not wish to compromise the integrity of the piece in one way or the other.
Halaster wrote:I'd prefer a nice, fully edited transcription. In other words, correct any spelling errors, typos, etc.
Mythmere wrote:I absolutely would like to see the original pages.
The Robilar wrote:There is of course the problem of IP when it comes to Greyhawk significance.
mbassoc2003 wrote:So, spell it differently and claim it has no connection what so ever.Grayhawk or Greyhack or 'the unmentionable EGG campaign setting' or just refer to 'GH'.
Badmike wrote:I vote for redoing and modernizing the entire thing, but perhaps at the back of the module having a few pages showing the original manuscript and parts of maps (like the ones on your webpage). It's cool to see the original handwritten pages, but I'm sure in the long run this would get tedious and would add unneccesary pages and cost to the project. A couple of examples are nice, but I really don't need to see the entire module in the original form.Mike B.
The Robilar wrote:What about if the occur in the keyed encounter textm which is what I am referring to.