ExTSR wrote in Stump the Forum:Sorry about the delay...Back on 30 Nov, I wrote in Stump the Forum:Where in D&D canon* does the following sentence appear?"This monster only attacks metal objects, it will not physically harm an adventurer."* canon, ie not in a magazine or adventureMetal-Demon wrote:The Monster Manual (Rust Monster)?That's the obvious reference, but no, quote's not from the Monster Manual (I).This is from the MM1 Errata Sheet (only; this wording does not appear in MM1 itself).
Back on 30 Nov, I wrote in Stump the Forum:Where in D&D canon* does the following sentence appear?"This monster only attacks metal objects, it will not physically harm an adventurer."* canon, ie not in a magazine or adventure
Metal-Demon wrote:The Monster Manual (Rust Monster)?
That's the obvious reference, but no, quote's not from the Monster Manual (I).
stratochamp wrote in Stump the Forum:well i don't know what it is David...
grodog wrote in Stump the Forum:Me neither, but the cover image seems to depict the Witch King attack on Eowyn and Merry in the Battle of the Pelennor Fields??
grodog wrote in Stump the Forum:ExTSR wrote in Stump the Forum:Sorry about the delay...This is from the MM1 Errata Sheet (only; this wording does not appear in MM1 itself).Is there any similar errata about the Carrion Crawler?---I've always given them a minimal bit attack (1-2 points of damage), figuring that they've got to eat somehow Hmm, or perhaps on the Monster Card....
ExTSR wrote in Stump the Forum:Sorry about the delay...This is from the MM1 Errata Sheet (only; this wording does not appear in MM1 itself).
stratochamp wrote in Stump the Forum:a ferocious beast that would trample through the crotchety old Evelyn Woods and the young Nattily Woods (to borrow a line from Bored of the Rings).