grodog wrote:Just like the previous thread, I called Tadashi's attention to this thread, since he is in fact the owner of the rights for all GL products.

I can't imagine that Different Worlds will allow someone to steal revenue by using our intellectual property, especially when we a) are still selling legitimate, original copies of the books, and b) have plans to reprint GL material under a d20 conversion.

    What I don't get is....if you plan to make fake copies, why use pink paper?

    Was that just what he had on-hand?

    Why not invest just a tiny amount of leg work and get tan paper?  :x

Mark

3) You know what happens when you ass u me?

I am not sure what that means but it doesn't sound good.

I sent him another taunting message. We'll see what the reply is. I'm going to try to get him to admit he copied them himself, if he did indeed do so.

bclarkie wrote:

Badmike wrote:

bclarkie wrote:BTW, it is also illegal to sell photocopies of pages for which WOTC will be notified of as well.

Brian, what was he selling photocopies of from WOTC? On his site he's only selling the fake GameLords stuff right now.

Mike B.

Mike, he is selling Deities & Demigods with photocopied pages of the Cthulhu and Melniboinean mythos. I do have an update as well, here is his response to my latest query:

    As long as he's giving the photocopies away and not selling them, he's in the clear.  It really depends on how you word it more than anything; he'd just have to make it clear he was giving the pages away for "free" and not selling them with the book. Even then, someone has to find it objectionable and no doubt WOTC or Kenzer (whoever owns the DDG copyright) aren't going to go after this kind of nickel and dime stuff.  I mean look at the illegal cds blatantly sold on ebay all the time.
      Kind of like when he says he's selling a "copy" of the Game Lords stuff, this could be construed as an actual copy or a literal "copy" of the real item.  He's been very astute about covering his ass should he ever be challenged.

Mike B.

Quote:

I'll tell you the same thing I told the other eBayer you are in league with. Unfortunately, he did not tell this:

1) I am not selling photocopies. Contact anyone you want.

2) Kindly go away unless you have a legitimate question. e-mail to harass is a violation of eBay rules; your e-mails have no merit and have been reported.


Giving away photocopied material is not illegal? Since when?

mbassoc2003 wrote:

Badmike wrote:As long as he's giving the photocopies away and not selling them, he's in the clear.

By that rationale, if you sell a 3E rule book and give away a free DVD of PDFs, you're also in the clear. The buyer has the option of not receiving the free DVD if they choose.

Legally, it's a very sticky issue. It's how private resellers of professional sports tickets get around scalping laws.  You can see the ads in the paper sometimes: "Selling this large Thanksgiving Turkey for $500...BTW, given away FREE with the turkey are two 50 yard line tickets to see the Cowboys play the Broncos this Thursday at Texas Stadium".  The buyer could always decide not to take the tickets and instead just eat that succulent $500 turkey...
  Same with photocopies.  Generally anything already freely distributed (say, the free downloads at the WOTC site) can be given away for free without represcussion.  I don't want to get into any copyright discussions (please lord Jesus no) because they devolve into 100 differing opinions all backed up with what sounds like sound advice from 100 lawyer wanna bes (and even some lawyers, who truth be told unless that is your legal specialty don't know a thing about it either) and generally no one cares because it all boils down to if you give the copies away for no profit, generally nothing can or will be done.  So case in point unless DandD guy is charging for the DDG Cthulhu pages it isn't an issue to anyone really, unless he states he is either selling them separately or charging a premium price for the book expressly because of the sheets.
     Hell, some of the stuff in the Collectors Trove auctions are photocopied.  A lot of tourneys sold are just photocopies. I've probably given away hundreds of copies of D&D articles and modules in my lifetime that were photocopied out of Dragon mags, Dungeon mags, etc.  I just don't personally have a problem with it...now, when morons pop up on ebay blatantly selling a pdf with "complete works of D&D" on it I do have a problem.  But if they go to the smallest protection of saying as you did "here is a 3rd edition book, btw tucked into the cover is a FREE pdf with the complete works of D&D" then they have covered themselves pretty well legally.  
  As refers to DandD, I would suppose nailing him on anything will prove to be impossible.  Even if he was printing them up in his basement as we speak.  Hell, multi-million dollar authors and their works are counterfeited all the time and they have a hell of a time ever getting anyone in trouble for it.  Ask Art Buchwald, his book "Coming To America" was stolen word for word by Eddie Murphy for his movie of the same name without any attribution, and it took him about 10 years in court to see one cent of damages.  This is why I keep saying watch out for the future..someday, someone is going to run adequate looking copies of Starstone or Tulan of the Isles, and there won't be a thing anyone can do about it.

Mike B.

If Tadashie contacts ebay as copyrights owner of the material in question they will pull the items immediately. Unless they think he doesn't have the resources to sue ebay itself. This is why they are so prompt to address Hasbro's complaints that are directed through the copyright thread here.

Heroic Worlds is missing lots of info. Especially on intensive/complete print run listing. A great and early resource but is limited.  :wink:

if tadashi contacts ebay and tells them that his copyright is being breached by persons X Y and Z with listings A B and C, ebay will pull them.

he just needs to go through the VERO programme and they WILL sort it - believe me they are as sharp as feck when you start down that route. i've been on the receiving end of that once (totally unknowingly) - the listing took 2 hrs 30 mins or so, to be removed.

Al

deimos3428 wrote:

Badmike wrote:Legally, it's a very sticky issue.
...
Same with photocopies. Generally anything already freely distributed (say, the free downloads at the WOTC site) can be given away for free without represcussion.

Ok, I'm not a lawyer, but I'm seriously considering becoming one now.

Legally, it's a very clear issue. Practically, it is very difficult to enforce every PDF out there and usually not worth the hassle of taking these morons to court.

Just because WotC is allowing people to download material for free from their website does not imply others have the right to redistribute that material. As the copyright holder, WotC has that exclusive right. They may authorize others to do so, or they may not. Perhaps they want customers to visit their site and be subjected to their advertising whilst downloading the files, for example. (Section 106(3))

D&D articles photocopied/quoted from magazines are a different issue. Assuming you're just photocopying an article or quoting a passage, for criticism or comment, that can be considered fair use. The amount of the material copied is significant. (Section 107(2))

As far as throwing in a bunch of copyrighted "free" material along with a legitimate sale, no dice. It's infringement of copyright either way, only the punishment differs. This is precisely why distribution rights are so important. (Section 501)

Trying to prove actual damages and profits would futile as the infringer is giving away the material for free. They should be electing to recover statutory damages instead. (Section 504(c))

In most cases, nobody will care or do anything about it, but I would. Statutory damages can result in a fine of $750 to $30,000 as the court considers just. There are additional possible penalties and way too much legalese, but that seems good enough to me. (Section 504(c)(2))

If you want to read more, get the PDF (how's that for irony) of the US Copyright Law, it's really not a very difficult read:
http://www.copyright.gov/title17

    One reason I always hate this subject is that it gets buried in legalese.  I always ask someone to please cite the exact case where someone was awarded a monetary amount for copyright infringement, and they collected said amount, for copyright infringement by an individual for less than, say, $10k worth of damages by copying pdfs or magazine articles. You can't find them.  They don't exist.  No one cares unless you are a huge corporation with hordes of lawyers willing to spend time and money.  The best, absolute best, result is to get the listings removed from Ebay or the internet.  I don't even know if that would happen in this case we are talking about.  As for legally, good luck finding a lawyer willing to handle your case.  They are too busy chasing the next cigarette or asbestos payday, or making a steady income fighting traffic tickets in court, to get much worked up about your loss.
      I have actual hands on experience.  The Savings and Loan I worked for in the 80's went through a TWO YEAR legal battle over copyrighted material.  I was directly involved in that I was an assistant to the bank president and had to deal with the paperwork every day.  We had the company absolutely dead to rights ( I won't go into the monotonous details here) and could prove very substantial damages.  It took over two years of legal battles just to get to the point where we were basically awarded a pittance and the other company had to cease and desist (which they had already done about a year earlier).  We spent over ten times the actual damages awarded just to defend a copyright, which in the end wasn't worth it in terms of money, manhours and misery.  It was absolutely ridiculous. Which is why you see most companies, beyond writing and sending a scary sounding "cease and desist" letter, will do nothing.  
 If someone was photocopying say a magazine article you wrote, and selling it online, I could see the anger involved and the need to "nail the bastards" and try to recover damages. Any GOOD lawyer (that is, a lawyer with your best interests involved and not one just looking for someone to stick for billable hours) would tell you to ignore it (besides sending the scary sounding letter).  Otherwise you would spend money and time, which you will never get back, trying to get $500 out of someone who probably will never pay the amount anyway.  Hey, that's if you even win the judgement, I've seen slam dunks get booted out of court (ours almost was and it was pretty much a no brainer). It's a losing game unfortunately and if you play it, you are only bringing misery upon yourself.
    Look at it this way.  Speeding is against the law.  I haven't had a speeding ticket in over 10years, yet I probably speed every single day I drive.  If I speed 100 mph right in front of a cop, I will probably get pulled over. If I run 10 mph over the limit and watch for officers, slowing down when I see them, I can go ten years or more without a ticket.  The analogy applies. DandD is going about 15 mph over the limit, but he was unlucky enough to pass a few concerned citizens willing to call in his license number.  Maybe he'll get a ticket, maybe not.  Should be interesting to see how it works out.
  Someday maybe I'll write a book about the case I was peripherally involved in.  It would make you want to kill a lawyer, if you hadn't thought about it already  :twisted:

Mike B.