faro wrote:So much for "buyer's market".
Xaxaxe wrote:Outliers ... there's always going to be those outliers in any set of data.
davidc wrote:Umm... my # 15 is green.Is that the camera playing tricks, or are my eyes failing? (or is there a reprinting I don't know about?)
beasterbrook wrote:by low I mean single digit..
beasterbrook wrote:, although The beholder has seen a far few for sale lately (but they were reprinted quite a bit I suppose)..
davidc wrote:yup... mine's like that.I haven't seen your index before, so I'll be busy for a little while...Thanks, Brett
faro wrote:re. DL;Still don't know quite how many reprints on those... Doesn't help, either, to have to deal with the overlapping earlier in the run when trying to work that out!
faro wrote:Messed up the camera angle, so apologies for the rotation artifacts.
beasterbrook wrote:a lot of small print runs for a zine thats for sure, hard to know as did reprints only on issues that ran out etc... you actively collecting the print runs? I don't think I will be, althought I do have a copy of examples of the different prints...Brette:)
benjoshua wrote:The "rotation artifacts" appear perfectly aligned.
beasterbrook wrote:needs updating.. but I'm going wiki style I think easier for other people to do and indexing etc..
faro wrote:Had been putting together a spare set or two over time only generally where those were relatively "sensibly" priced - aiming £5 average, say - either for freebies or swaps, without getting into any "bidding wars".
Mars wrote:This is just crazy:http://offer.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll? ... 0354507656