ashmire13 wrote:TheHistorian wrote:But to pay that much for a SW copy, which obviously Frank couldn't have ever used, seems nuts. Personally, I'd think an opened copy that had some notes from actual use would be much more interesting. Of course, I don't really understand the SW mindset anyway...I'd agree. For me, a copy owned by a gaming name from the past would HAVE to have their DNA, fingerprints (and notes preferably) to make me pay way over. I wouldn't pay any more for a SW copy of anything owned by them as I would if it were owned by Joe Schmo.I'd love even an old battered gaming book owned by Frank for instance, but I know they'll never reach the shores over here for me to pick up.
TheHistorian wrote:But to pay that much for a SW copy, which obviously Frank couldn't have ever used, seems nuts. Personally, I'd think an opened copy that had some notes from actual use would be much more interesting. Of course, I don't really understand the SW mindset anyway...
davidc wrote:** eBay auction listing blocked. Please enable cookies in your browser for this site and for eBay! **No Honour in Sathporte, don't see this one often
Prufrock wrote:davidc wrote:** eBay auction listing blocked. Please enable cookies in your browser for this site and for eBay! **No Honour in Sathporte, don't see this one often Seller has a positive feedback rating of 92.3!!!!! I would stay far away.
JasonZavoda wrote:I've never even heard of this one before. Seller also has some mono covers starting at $5
JasonZavoda wrote:davidc wrote:** eBay auction listing blocked. Please enable cookies in your browser for this site and for eBay! **No Honour in Sathporte, don't see this one often I've never even heard of this one before. Seller also has some mono covers starting at $5
Kingofpain89 wrote:Prufrock wrote:Seller has a positive feedback rating of 92.3!!!!! I would stay far away.Doesnt look all that bad to me. Only one negative rating and that from a 15 feedback newbie that didnt get their crappy watch immediately after paying and thought that was too long to wait. :roll:
Prufrock wrote:Seller has a positive feedback rating of 92.3!!!!! I would stay far away.
Prufrock wrote:Seller lists it in "Great Condition" now we are learning it might have a page missing. Personally if a seller is below 98% positive feedback I stay away. This one is at 92.3% and says the item is in "Great Condition". You can tell from the pic it is not in great condition.Martin
Kingofpain89 wrote:Cougarrinard has a 100% positive feedback rating. Will you buy from him now? :)
Gnat the Beggar wrote:Kingofpain89 wrote:Cougarrinard has a 100% positive feedback rating. Will you buy from him now? :)Yep.I have bought items from him and sold to him and even did a bit of trading as well.Never had a problem.
Gnat the Beggar wrote:Martin,Question for the forum...How do you get a FB total of 113 with just 64 feedbacks?
Gnat the Beggar wrote:Question for the forum...How do you get a FB total of 113 with just 64 feedbacks?
TheHistorian wrote:I'm talking with the seller about Sathporte - looks like it may be missing a page. I'll update when I know more.
Mars wrote:TheHistorian wrote:I'm talking with the seller about Sathporte - looks like it may be missing a page. I'll update when I know more.Its looking like this one may be a bit more incomplete - possibly missing some adventure pages. If anyone here wins this, I can provide copies of the missing pages.