mbassoc2003 wrote:You really get pissed at that sort of thing, don't you?
mbassoc2003 wrote:Presumably mine is the Mint copy sold in February 03. That ties up with the price and sale date on Burnies index card in the module.
mbassoc2003 wrote:If mine is mint (and other than the slightest brushing to one corner it appears to be), the one you've bought doesn't look that far off. I'd swap mint for VF/EX to get a folder like that.
mbassoc2003 wrote:I see improv's point on the black folder. I had similar opinions regarding time and expence back on the mid-late '70s. Very expensive cover.
mbassoc2003 wrote:The one you've just bought does not look like it has enough pages to be printed single-sided. I would say that the double-sided black folder edition was TSR's intended presentation of the module.
mbassoc2003 wrote:Tadashi's is the only single-sided copy I was aware of. All the others I've heard of are double-sided. Mine is double-sided. Are you aware of any other single-sided copies, with or without folders.
Deadlord36 wrote:Mine is single sided, black foldered.
bclarkie wrote:1st print Traveller Box Set here with a $100.00 BIN:cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem& ... eName=WDVW
harami2000 wrote:En Garde! Frank....You're bidding on a photocopy, btw...
mbassoc2003 wrote:harami2000 wrote:En Garde! Frank....You're bidding on a photocopy, btw... And the seller's from Pennsylvania...
Deadlord36 wrote:Not anymore. Thanks for the heads up. I have no idea why I even bid on it, I'm selling my miniature wargame stuff anyways.
mbassoc2003 wrote:I see no reason why 'estimated values' should appear on the site. They are subjective based on the opinions of the estimator.At 34 pages with a spiral binding, MB's copy looks like a proof copy at best. If it could be authenticated it would be useful.