mbassoc2003 wrote:So what were the gems in there? I was after Black Tower and Chainmail. I don't know about most of the other stuff. I just took a gamble.
harami2000 wrote:Kinda regretting reducing my max bid- couldn't afford much more, given the other auctions, ongoing. *shrugs*.
bclarkie wrote:No I don't think its to low, not at all. I just see you guys go head to head with your snipes a lot and it just makes me laugh. Those silly other bidders think they have a chance at getting a great deal and then BAM oh look they are in 3rd place.
Deadlord36 wrote:Ralf is, as usual, dead on. Those were the gems. That is only the third copy of that printing of Thaumaturgy I've ever seen, I have one and Burnie has one.
mbassoc2003 wrote:My WF2 just sold for £33.
dbartman wrote:harami2000,The PoVQ you won could be a first or second print, despite the fact that it says first print, based on The Acaeum's info. Once you receive could you provide more info? Just trying to figure out how to classify it.Thanks
dbartman wrote:Also please let me know your assessment on the condition. It appears to be VG to Fine condition based on the sellers description and the photos.Thanks
dbartman wrote:FYI, Tadashi's copy was graded as fine. Unlike what was mentioned in the description.
dbartman wrote:Ultimately, what an individual chooses to pay for an item, based on the facts they have available, is entirely up to them. The condition is just one factor in the equation.
FYI, Tadashi's copy was graded as fine. Unlike what was mentioned in the description.
Ultimately, what an individual chooses to pay for an item, based on the facts they have available, is entirely up to them. The condition is just one factor in the equation.
dbartman wrote:First, I'm afraid you have blown this out of proportion.
dbartman wrote:FYI, Tadashi's copy was graded as fine. Unlike what was mentioned in the description.The records that I am currently maintaining are not reflected in what is on The Acaeum.
dbartman wrote:Also, the grading conventions that I'm using are not published on The Acaeum. They were developed by the Valuation Board members. Please see the following information for more details on what is transpiring:The Acaeum Valuation BoardI hope this provides some enlightenment.
dbartman wrote:Why do you dispute this? You bought the PoVQ based on the facts that were available to you. There was no guarantee that the item was NM as indicated. In your case, perhaps condition was the ultimate factor, but not necessarily to everyone else.
mbassoc2003 wrote:So does anyone know what grading Burnies copy was given?
harami2000 wrote:mbassoc2003 wrote:So does anyone know what grading Burnies copy was given?Presumably the same grade as the one I won, once I'm finished with the hairdrier. (Thanks again to Mike <invincible> for the tip).