Worst Dungeons & Dragons product ever!!!
Post new topic Reply to topic Page 7 of 81234, 5, 6, 78
Author

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 6720
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Last Visit: Feb 02, 2021

Post Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2006 9:11 pm 
 

bclarkie wrote:No worries about me throwing out any books.  The only way I could bring myself to throw out a D&D book is if it has some irremovable bodily fluid such as the 3 Ps.  I was going to be witty and say that if someone gave me a 3rd edition D&D book, I would throw it out, but that wouldn't count because thats not really a D&D book anyway. :P


  OK...I'll take the bait.

    You guys sound like your fathers.

Mark   8)


"But I have watched the dragons come, fire-eyed, across the world."

  


Long-Winded Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 3066
Joined: Jul 09, 2004
Last Visit: Apr 30, 2015

Post Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2006 9:11 pm 
 

bclarkie wrote:Pee, Poop, & Puke(keeping it as clean as possible). :wink:  Those 3 would religate a book to the trash.  I imagine that if some how bile or an over amount of phlemage(is this even a word?  :lol: ) was involved that might make them trash worthy as well.

Those are all forms of acid damage.  Perhaps I need to move acid down to "Poor" with the fire types:  :?
http://www.acaeum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=41431#41431

 YIM  


Prolific Collector

Posts: 132
Joined: Nov 29, 2005
Last Visit: Aug 02, 2006
Location: Clifton Park, NY

Post Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:17 am 
 

I never had a problem of OA falling apart. UA, not enough duck-tape to hold that mother together. I found that OE to be poorly written, but I love UA.

  


Long-Winded Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 3066
Joined: Jul 09, 2004
Last Visit: Apr 30, 2015

Post Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 10:33 am 
 

Zippanthropus wrote:I never had a problem of OA falling apart. UA, not enough duck-tape to hold that mother together. I found that OE to be poorly written, but I love UA.

My OA is in fairly pristine condition.  (That's a new one for the eBay listings -- "fairly pristine" = "not falling apart".)  I bought it just to complete my orange spines.  UA tends to suffer more because it was actually used.

 YIM  

User avatar

Verbose Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 1230
Joined: Mar 08, 2003
Last Visit: Oct 25, 2021
Location: Close to GenCon

Post Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 12:21 pm 
 

deimos3428 wrote:
Zippanthropus wrote:I never had a problem of OA falling apart. UA, not enough duck-tape to hold that mother together. I found that OE to be poorly written, but I love UA.

My OA is in fairly pristine condition.  (That's a new one for the eBay listings -- "fairly pristine" = "not falling apart".)  I bought it just to complete my orange spines.  UA tends to suffer more because it was actually used.


We have a "Frankenstein" OA with two 1/4" bolts holding the pages into the cover :lol:

seriously

  


Prolific Collector

Posts: 132
Joined: Nov 29, 2005
Last Visit: Aug 02, 2006
Location: Clifton Park, NY

Post Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 12:48 pm 
 

UA tends to suffer more because it was actually used.


Ahhhh ha ha ha! ROTFLMAO JPMP! Now that is funny! and true.

  


Prolific Collector

Posts: 226
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
Last Visit: Sep 02, 2014

Post Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 12:50 pm 
 

My OA is fine, aside from it being *upside down/back to front* in the binding.

I just found one of Talisman boards though has mild dew on it :-(  (have to try to figure out how to deal with that when I'm back in the UK :/).


Mount Celestia doesn't want me and Baator's afraid I'll take over.



Ninty-eight Blue and Green Slaad at the door, Ninty-eight Blue and Green Slaad, Take one down, they gate in two more, Ninty-nine Blue and Green Slaad at the door...

  


Prolific Collector

Posts: 636
Joined: Sep 14, 2005
Last Visit: Jan 16, 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada

Post Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 1:30 pm 
 

I haven't encountered binding problems with any 1st edition rule books.  Both my OA and UA are prefectly intact (aside from cover/corner wear) despite spending over 10 years in a backpack that I took almost everywhere.

 WWW  


Active Collector

Posts: 87
Joined: Aug 15, 2004
Last Visit: Aug 28, 2019

Post Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 1:45 pm 
 

Xaxaxe wrote:
red_dawn wrote:Deities & Demigods

Wow, that surprises me. I always thought that Deities was a great product — there was lots of cool artwork, some educational stuff about some religions I knew nothing about, and, of course, lots of bitchin' power-gaming stats. And, remember, the edition with the Cthulhu and Elric listings is really Super-Mondo-Way-Rare ... you can get, like, $1,000 for one. It was "banned," you know ... 8O

But your point about the runaway munchkin-ism is dead-on. That book just seemed to bring out the worst in everyone (bitch-slapping Elric and getting my hands on an official AD&D version of Stormbringer was one of my goals). I would argue that that sort of rampant power-gaming was more of a reflection on the players rather than the book, though. YMMV, of course.


OK, I was being a bit dramatic. The DDG isn't completely without merit. The art work is excellent, and the Ability Stat tables beyond 18 were helpful. I have to admit that it is still part of my collection.  :oops:

But the powergaming blame rests squarely on TSR... and yes, maybe Gygax with the set-piece Lolth fight (as MShipley88 pointed out) -- though I feel that's a special case, since that was the culmination of the A, G, & D series modules; an epic campaign surely.

With the average deity description in the DDG being virtually all combat stats, TSR was giving official sanction to said power-gaming. It was left to the DM to block this move, and to fill out the paltry clergy info in the DDG appendix.

OK, DDG isn't the worst AD&D product... but it set a poor precedent. From a roleplay perspective, the 2nd edition Legends & Lore was much more useful.

  

User avatar

Active Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 74
Joined: Dec 23, 2005
Last Visit: Oct 25, 2021
Location: Norwood, MA

Post Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2006 9:16 pm 
 

Zippanthropus wrote:
Am I the only geek who checks this site like 10 times a day?


Nope... I check it about 10 times a day myself!

  

User avatar

Verbose Collector

Posts: 1271
Joined: Jan 09, 2005
Last Visit: Nov 17, 2020
Location: Azeroth

Post Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 3:34 pm 
 

sheeadog wrote:
Zippanthropus wrote:
Am I the only geek who checks this site like 10 times a day?


Nope... I check it about 10 times a day myself!


Wish I could cut down to ten  :lol:


Information Superhighway - A Rough Whimper of Insanity - Scott Hansen

  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector

Posts: 8219
Joined: Jan 21, 2005
Last Visit: Jun 12, 2017
Location: Wallasey, Merseyside, UK

Post Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 5:02 pm 
 

Marlith wrote:
sheeadog wrote:
Nope... I check it about 10 times a day myself!


Wish I could cut down to ten  :lol:


i check about 50+ times  :oops:



  


Sage Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 2884
Joined: Nov 04, 2004
Last Visit: May 09, 2020

Post Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 5:04 pm 
 

killjoy32 wrote:i check about 50+ times  :oops:

And post on 49 of those occasions. :wink:

Kidding, kidding! All in good-natured fun ...

 WWW  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector

Posts: 8219
Joined: Jan 21, 2005
Last Visit: Jun 12, 2017
Location: Wallasey, Merseyside, UK

Post Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 5:05 pm 
 

Xaxaxe wrote:
killjoy32 wrote:i check about 50+ times  :oops:

And post on 49 of those occasions. :wink:

Kidding, kidding! All in good-natured fun ...


ya know, youre prb right - i dont have a life, so i gotta do something with it! :)

Al



  

User avatar

Long-Winded Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 3861
Joined: Feb 21, 2004
Last Visit: Jul 20, 2021
Location: Milford, Michigan

Post Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 5:40 pm 
 

Wake up. S, S & S. Get coffee. Check Acaeum. Wake up kids...everything begins to go south from there.


And I could've bought these damn modules off the 1$ rack!!!

New modules for your Old School game http://pacesettergames.com/

Everything Pacesetter at http://pacesettergames.blog.com/

 WWW  

User avatar

Verbose Collector
Acaeum Donor
Valuation Board

Posts: 1861
Joined: May 01, 2004
Last Visit: Oct 25, 2021
Location: Almost Lake Geneva, WI

Post Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 6:26 pm 
 

Re-reading some old posts, looks like BadMike doesn't care for my work.

'sall right. I don't write to please everyone; that way lies madness.


Somebody else liked DL for the 'first 3d dungeon views, 'way kewl'...

Sorry; that was my idea, in R1 Falx; Steve Sullivan did the maps, at my direction. 3d was used thereafter in many products.

  

User avatar

Long-Winded Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 3593
Joined: Dec 20, 2003
Last Visit: Oct 17, 2021
Location: Canada

Post Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 6:54 pm 
 

ExTSR wrote:Re-reading some old posts, looks like BadMike doesn't care for my work.

'sall right. I don't write to please everyone; that way lies madness.


Somebody else liked DL for the 'first 3d dungeon views, 'way kewl'...

Sorry; that was my idea, in R1 Falx; Steve Sullivan did the maps, at my direction. 3d was used thereafter in many products.


Your stuff was very good!!


Games can get you through times of no money but money can not get you through times of no games!!

 WWW  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector

Posts: 8219
Joined: Jan 21, 2005
Last Visit: Jun 12, 2017
Location: Wallasey, Merseyside, UK

Post Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 7:06 pm 
 

Blackmoor wrote:
ExTSR wrote:Re-reading some old posts, looks like BadMike doesn't care for my work.

'sall right. I don't write to please everyone; that way lies madness.


Somebody else liked DL for the 'first 3d dungeon views, 'way kewl'...

Sorry; that was my idea, in R1 Falx; Steve Sullivan did the maps, at my direction. 3d was used thereafter in many products.


Your stuff was very good!!


i quite like R1 and R2 - must get around to playing them with the group sometime.

Al



  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 6720
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Last Visit: Feb 02, 2021

Post Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 11:58 pm 
 

3d maps always looked good...they just weren't useful for actually playing the so-afflicted modules.

The 3d fiasco of Ravenloft is probably the prime example.

Mark   8)


"But I have watched the dragons come, fire-eyed, across the world."

  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 7969
Joined: Jun 23, 2003
Last Visit: Oct 23, 2021
Location: DFW TX

Post Posted: Thu May 11, 2006 12:42 am 
 

ExTSR wrote:Re-reading some old posts, looks like BadMike doesn't care for my work.

'sall right. I don't write to please everyone; that way lies madness.


Somebody else liked DL for the 'first 3d dungeon views, 'way kewl'...

Sorry; that was my idea, in R1 Falx; Steve Sullivan did the maps, at my direction. 3d was used thereafter in many products.



Hmm, I did like to throw around an opinion in those days.  Here are some of my relevant tidbits:

The CM and IM series for basic D&D.....horribly overpowered, I could never even use the floorplans or monsters, these completely useless to me.  Even stuff like the DL series I can use, if nothing else I recycle the floorplans, whereas the above mentioned series didn't even have useful floorplans.

Forgot about WG9 and WG10.  These were pretty bad I agree.  I11 Needle seems to suffer by not having a good central idea or adventure encounter, wasn't it pretty much entirely random encounters?


Sounds like I pretty much hated everything Frank's done, but I swear that's not the case.  :o
 I confess that I was not fond of the basic game and the various rules sets (basic, expert, masters, companion and Immortals) because my group played AD&D exclusively.  Back in the day there was a lot of animosity between the "AD&D" and "Basic D&D" crowd. Interestingly I just read a very old article by Phil Gallagher today where he was also skeptical of the Immortals set until Frank ran him in an adventure (can you confirm this Frank?).  Maybe if Frank had run myself and my group through some of the IM series I would be more on board....but I just personally had no use for playing 30+ level characters, my group had never even seen a character over level 18 ever (even until this day, almost 30 years later), so the idea of playing super high level characters just held no attraction to me or my players.
  As for Needle, I still think it's interesting idea in search of a unifying plot thread. It's one of the few 1st edition adventures I never ran in the day, I just personally never warmed up to it.
  However, I did run the R-series, R2 more than once, liked that and R1. R1 had some truly great traps and encounters; R2 should just how nasty a high level Illusionist coudl be as an opponent.   T1-4 is a classic, I've run this multiple times.  Loved Aeshaba (used some of it in my own campaign world when creating a jungle kingdom).  Loved Baltron's Beacon and ran it multiple times (didn't you help write this one Frank?).  Enjoyed The Convert but never ran it.
   There are plenty of authors out there whose stuff I hated WAY more than your stuff Frank. :)

Mike B.


"THE MORE YOU THINK ABOUT WHY i DONE WHAT i DONE THE MORE i LAUGH" Cougar
"The Acaeum hates fun" Sir Allen
"I had a collecting emergency" Nogrod
Co-founder of the North Texas RPG Con
http://www.ntrpgcon.com

 WWW  
PreviousNext
Post new topic Reply to topic Page 7 of 81234, 5, 6, 78