nevadaknight wrote:Well if thats the case here is my humble game room. s304.photobucket.com/albums/nn166/nevad ... me%20Room/My album is public so if you want you can see my ugly mug and photos of my trip to the Lehman Caves I took in June.Dwayne
Angus_The_Red wrote:With that being said, HELLO fellow gamers, both veteran & beginner. My name is Angus, 35 years young, and I'm from Houston Texas.
Angus_The_Red wrote:I love D&D 3.5, and will not leave until better comes.
Angus_The_Red wrote:...decided to sell my M:TG collection for funds to help support my family (wife and daughter).
Angus_The_Red wrote:Consequently, 2nd Edition is where I spent the most of my years as an earlier gamer.
Angus_The_Red wrote:I'm still missing many modules, but my collection is 127 modules strong, which, according to the Acaeum listing, leaves me with a mere 214 (roughly, not counting the DL series as I was never a fan) to finish the deed.
Angus_The_Red wrote:I aspire to one day be AN authority (not THE authority, but maybe AN authority) on module collections in Texas. Not too difficult a goal, although not easy either (especially on the pocketbook).
Angus_The_Red wrote:Any assistance that you good folks can provide me as I continue on my path would be greatly appreciated, and I promise to help whenever and wherever I can in return.
Angus_The_Red wrote:I have spent many a night, reading discussions and thoughts in this forum... and let me just say, it's nice to be a part of it finally, instead of the guy looking in thru the window. Anyhow, that just about sums me up. Thanks for having me.
Angus_The_Red wrote:I do however still enjoy a big bowl of Lucky Charms from time to time. WHO'S WITH ME?!?!
Plaag wrote:Nah, don't care for that 'marshmallow' stuff they put in cereals. Now Raisin Bran Crunch that's where its at. ShaneG.
Angus_The_Red wrote:Actually, I like Pathfinder a great deal. It's just that I don't mind playing with 3.5 as it is. So many people have swisscheesed 3.5 for its problems, but for players like myself who have an older mindset about how to play, and are mindful not to exploit a problem, but work around it or alter it, the problems don't make 3.5 worthless. No single Edition is perfect ya know.I've always felt you don't judge an edition for its shortcomings. You judge it, by its capabilities. If it helps you to enjoy what D&D really is, then you'll be just fine. Combined with how I run a game, and how my players generally play, 3.5 functions without a flaw. (shrug) I guess my games are more about the story, and the moment, and less about finite details.Strangely enough, I used to rip the front introduction page out of my 2nd Edition PHBs and burn them. I'd get pissed at idea that all of the rules in the PHB, that took hard work to concieve and create, that in the end were sound enough to be printed on b&w and sold the public could be conditional. NEVER! Changing the rules, or altering them, or the idea that they were just a suggestion - pure horse hockey. They HAD to be absolute gospel law. Heh. Foolish boy.I do however still enjoy a big bowl of Lucky Charms from time to time. WHO'S WITH ME?!?!
Reverend Doyle wrote:Hello. My name is Nate. I'm 41 and have been gaming since 6th grade which was 1980 (Dungeons & Dragons red box). I didn't really start actually "collecting" games until about 10 or 12 years ago. I'd have to say that one of my most jealously guarded items is a Dungeons & Dragons 5th printing white box set. It's good to be among other collectors.