Deadlord36 wrote:Buyer and seller beware.Sorry, but I can't side with a seller who does not know the value of what he is selling. Ignorance in this day and age is inexcusable. Come on, if someone offered $125 for four beat-up books, would that not raise a freaking red flag in ANYONE's mind? At what point do you start saying "hmmm, maybe these are worth quite a bit?". If you don't really know the value of what you are selling, the choice is simple. DON'T FREAKING SELL IT.If you choose to sell on eBay, you do so of your own free will. No one forced the guy to sell for $125. And if he isn't smart enough to do research, too phuqing bad. He deserves what he gets.
Deadlord36 wrote: Come on, if someone offered $125 for four beat-up books, would that not raise a freaking red flag in ANYONE's mind? At what point do you start saying "hmmm, maybe these are worth quite a bit?". If you don't really know the value of what you are selling, the choice is simple. DON'T FREAKING SELL IT.
deimos3428 wrote:All you moral types can wander off at this point, because this isn't a matter of right and wrong, check your alignment chart again. Frank: Precisely. Everybody's dodging the issue; I would have offered him $20, given the chance...so the other guys potentially did the seller a favor. $125 is far too suspicious, and would have frightened most sellers off. As long as you don't mislead -- and who would believe such an "expert" anyway -- you're not doing anything unethical. Immoral, perhaps, but you were supposed to have wandered off by now.
radagast wrote:BTW I find very interesting the topic of how much ethic have to do with business ... Let me say: I think moral and economics are very different fields, completely different.
Ralf Toth wrote:radagast wrote:BTW I find very interesting the topic of how much ethic have to do with business ... Let me say: I think moral and economics are very different fields, completely different.This is where I totally disagree. As much as business is part of life, if you follow a basic moral code in life, that same moral code by default also applies to your business practices or else you're betraying yourself.
Ralf Toth wrote:Ah, I see now I misunderstood you. Thanks for the clarification!
Deadlord36 wrote:You're right, Breach. I personally think ST1 is worth $50. I'll offer that much next time one comes up.To be honest, this thread should die. It has been discussed in the past, and as is typical there are opinions from every conceivable point of view.
Deadlord36 wrote:Oh, and Breach, in the future you might want to think twice before posting something like that in Fun Finds until it is in hand. I know from experience that some people wouldn't think twice about offering the seller three times what the auction went for if the seller "wanted to make a lot more". $250 extra vs. a single negative is hard to argue with for a lot of sellers.