JonOakes wrote:Dathon,It was legit after all, IMHO. Foulfoot came in and set the record straight on the lightness of the paperstock in question.There was ALOT of debate and I personally wasn't convinced until Mr Foot came in and had a compelling set of arguments.It's a worthy thread to review! I just can't find it at the moment. I'm sure someone will post a link.
Deadlord36 wrote:The seller paid 50 cents for it at a yard sale.
harami2000 wrote:Not so cheap... ($100 at present with 1 1/2 days to go).Has anyone heard back from this seller as to whether these 11 modules are actually shrinkwrapped? I never heard back...Just out-of-interest, anyhow; but would seem reasonable, if so.http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... 5912586259
beasterbrook wrote:harami2000 wrote:Not so cheap... ($100 at present with 1 1/2 days to go).Has anyone heard back from this seller as to whether these 11 modules are actually shrinkwrapped? I never heard back...Just out-of-interest, anyhow; but would seem reasonable, if so.http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... 5912586259The pic shown doesn't look like its shinked and it looks strangly like half a coffee stain right in the middle of it, far from the MINT it claims to be anyway...
beasterbrook wrote:The pic shown doesn't look like its shinked and it looks strangly like half a coffee stain right in the middle of it, far from the MINT it claims to be anyway...
Deadlord36 wrote:Who cares if it's MIS, $100 is stupid for it anyways.
harami2000 wrote:11 modules stated "in plastic", not one... plus the "odds and sods".
morgansurname wrote:harami2000 wrote:11 modules stated "in plastic", not one... plus the "odds and sods".Perhaps by in plastic the seller refers to packing in bubble wrap or plastic sleeves.
dathon wrote:Or maybe he used that sticky plastic to "preserve" the covers. I've seen some auction descriptions where the seller thought that made it more collectible. Ouch....