burntwire wrote:Worse case scenario is we have a better condition 2nd print and can then trade or sell the other.
Deadlord36 wrote:It is a 3rd. The seller just e-mailed me.
stormber wrote:The larger label indicates a 2nd or later print but I'd bet a 3rd or later print based on my research. Woodgrain 1st prints, and possibly some 2nd and 3rd prints, have smaller labels, i.e., they are trimmed closer to the printing (both the top and side labels). This being the result of a bit of research I've been conducting after examining over 20 different woodgrain sets. Anything else is a "Frankenstein". I'll post my research here eventually. I have images of 20 confirmed printings and another 5 personally inspected sets.
JonOakes wrote:Dathon,It was legit after all, IMHO. Foulfoot came in and set the record straight on the lightness of the paperstock in question.There was ALOT of debate and I personally wasn't convinced until Mr Foot came in and had a compelling set of arguments.It's a worthy thread to review! I just can't find it at the moment. I'm sure someone will post a link.
Deadlord36 wrote:The seller paid 50 cents for it at a yard sale.
harami2000 wrote:Not so cheap... ($100 at present with 1 1/2 days to go).Has anyone heard back from this seller as to whether these 11 modules are actually shrinkwrapped? I never heard back...Just out-of-interest, anyhow; but would seem reasonable, if so.http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... 5912586259
beasterbrook wrote:harami2000 wrote:Not so cheap... ($100 at present with 1 1/2 days to go).Has anyone heard back from this seller as to whether these 11 modules are actually shrinkwrapped? I never heard back...Just out-of-interest, anyhow; but would seem reasonable, if so.http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... 5912586259The pic shown doesn't look like its shinked and it looks strangly like half a coffee stain right in the middle of it, far from the MINT it claims to be anyway...
beasterbrook wrote:The pic shown doesn't look like its shinked and it looks strangly like half a coffee stain right in the middle of it, far from the MINT it claims to be anyway...
Deadlord36 wrote:Who cares if it's MIS, $100 is stupid for it anyways.
harami2000 wrote:11 modules stated "in plastic", not one... plus the "odds and sods".
morgansurname wrote:harami2000 wrote:11 modules stated "in plastic", not one... plus the "odds and sods".Perhaps by in plastic the seller refers to packing in bubble wrap or plastic sleeves.