Cernunnos wrote:I hate to say it, but that artwork was never used to my knowledge. It was SUPPOSED to go into the Savage Coast Monstrous Compendium, and thats the only place I ever saw it.
Deadlord36 wrote:http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... 5912066017Pretty pricey for someone who is trying to "curb their spending". Methinks the Inverness was sour grapes after all. BTW, I left this one alone because I already have one, and I had no desire to jack the price up for a true collector. Had I known..........
dathon wrote:Deadlord36 wrote:http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... 5912066017Pretty pricey for someone who is trying to "curb their spending". Methinks the Inverness was sour grapes after all. BTW, I left this one alone because I already have one, and I had no desire to jack the price up for a true collector. Had I known..........Which printing was it? It went for a good price whatever the printing if the condition is as good as it looks.
dathon wrote:http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... 5912066017Which printing was it? It went for a good price whatever the printing if the condition is as good as it looks.
burntwire wrote:Worse case scenario is we have a better condition 2nd print and can then trade or sell the other.
Deadlord36 wrote:It is a 3rd. The seller just e-mailed me.
stormber wrote:The larger label indicates a 2nd or later print but I'd bet a 3rd or later print based on my research. Woodgrain 1st prints, and possibly some 2nd and 3rd prints, have smaller labels, i.e., they are trimmed closer to the printing (both the top and side labels). This being the result of a bit of research I've been conducting after examining over 20 different woodgrain sets. Anything else is a "Frankenstein". I'll post my research here eventually. I have images of 20 confirmed printings and another 5 personally inspected sets.