eBay fees on listings cancelled due to a policy violation may or may not be refunded, depending on the policy violated and/or the seller's prior (non)-compliance with eBay policies.
g026r wrote:And it's been removed.Question is whether the seller removed it or eBay took issue with him outright stating that he was willing to sell to somebody other than the winning bidder.
bonk! wrote:I think that action --trying to get an auction for a rare D&D item removed from the open marketplace --would be antithetical of what is promoted here by this collective.
** expired/removed eBay auction ** sPageName=STRK:MEWN:IT&ih=015
Deadlord39 wrote:I reported it as well. What an idiot.
serleran wrote:Wow! Now I feel all glad I bought mine for 1/3rd that (and thought that was high.) When did this item get so expensive?
Mars wrote:I reported the auction as listing violation under not actually having an item for sale or something like that. I don't think it is antithetical to what is promoted here at all. I think one thing that is strongly promoted here is that when a rare comes up, you want to be sure that the seller is honest and you will get what you paid for.With the auction listing as it was, there was no such guarantee that the seller would even sell it to the highest bidder. The listing was clearly just a fishing expedition to try and get offers.
Kingofpain89 wrote:Does anyone know if the seller is the same person that supposedly picked up the ST1 mentioned in this thread?viewtopic.php?t=6156&highlight=st1
bclarkie wrote:The aforementioned(in another thread), ST1: ** expired/removed eBay auction **Opening bid is extremely agressive though.
bclarkie wrote:It got expensive because it was in still in shirnk.