Interesting Items Formerly on eBay
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies. Page 54 of 114123 ... 51, 52, 53, 54, 55 ... 112113114
Author


Verbose Collector

Posts: 1324
Joined: May 28, 2007
Last Visit: Aug 27, 2011
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada

Post Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 9:21 am 
 

And it's been removed.

Question is whether the seller removed it or eBay took issue with him outright stating that he was willing to sell to somebody other than the winning bidder. :roll:


"Reader, Carthegena was of the mind, that unto thoſe Three Things, which the Ancients held Impoſſible, there ſhould be added this Fourth ; To find a Book Printed without Errata's."

  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector

Posts: 6161
Joined: May 03, 2003
Last Visit: Apr 09, 2024
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Post Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 10:32 am 
 

Just wondering, does a seller lose their fees if Ebay removes their auction?

EDIT:  I just looked it up and it seems Ebay can't really decided if they charge the fee or not:

eBay fees on listings cancelled due to a policy violation may or may not be refunded, depending on the policy violated and/or the seller's prior (non)-compliance with eBay policies.

 WWW  


Prolific Collector

Posts: 120
Joined: Nov 10, 2005
Last Visit: Mar 18, 2022
Location: Texas

Post Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 10:42 am 
 

g026r wrote:And it's been removed.

Question is whether the seller removed it or eBay took issue with him outright stating that he was willing to sell to somebody other than the winning bidder. :roll:


Yes, and I think a good follow-up question from there would be, if eBay removed the listing, was it as a result of someone from here reporting it to them?  I think that action --trying to get an auction for a rare D&D item removed from the open marketplace --would be antithetical of what is promoted here by this collective.

bonk!

  


Prolific Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 116
Joined: Nov 11, 2002
Last Visit: Jun 24, 2014
Location: Maine, USA

Post Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:06 am 
 

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... :IT&ih=015



Whew!



bclarkie...  My max was $71...  I was hoping to pick that up cheaper though!   rrrrrrrrr!   :D



Now I have to go tell the wife she is getting "Vecna Lives" for Christmas instead of something else...   8O   I do not anticipate amusement...



Happy Holidays!


Dere Fritoad, Two badd yoo copped outt so sooon lazt nighgt. Mised som grooovy trps. Hoap th rring thinng wurcs out awrighgt. Peece, Timm  PS Hear ar som outt of sihgt stash I'm laying onn yoo guyz. Must sine off as rush iss cocomcoming ohgodohgod$#%*@!

  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector

Posts: 6161
Joined: May 03, 2003
Last Visit: Apr 09, 2024
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Post Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:54 am 
 

bonk! wrote:I think that action --trying to get an auction for a rare D&D item removed from the open marketplace --would be antithetical of what is promoted here by this collective.


That might be a question to start a new thread over.  But I reported the auction as listing violation under not actually having an item for sale or something like that.  I don't think it is antithetical to what is promoted here at all.  I think one thing that is strongly promoted here is that when a rare comes up, you want to be sure that the seller is honest and you will get what you paid for.

With the auction listing as it was, there was no such guarantee that the seller would even sell it to the highest bidder.  The listing was clearly just a fishing expedition to try and get offers.  Would the seller have canceled the auction if it had bidders but he got a better private offer?  Probably.  If he wants to accept private offers then he should sell it privately not on Ebay.  If he wants to sell it on Ebay then he should guarantee that he'll actually sell it to the highest bidder on Ebay.

 WWW  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector

Posts: 5786
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Last Visit: Apr 23, 2024
Location: Cow Hampshire, US

Post Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:47 pm 
 

I reported it as well. What an idiot.


If you hit a Rowsdower, you get to keep it.

  

User avatar

Sage Collector

Posts: 2736
Joined: May 31, 2007
Last Visit: Mar 22, 2021

Post Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:49 pm 
 


** expired/removed eBay auction **
sPageName=STRK:MEWN:IT&ih=015




Wow! Now I feel all glad I bought mine for 1/3rd that (and thought that was high.) When did this item get so expensive?


Those who can, don't. Those who should not, do.

  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 8028
Joined: Jun 23, 2003
Last Visit: Apr 21, 2024
Location: DFW TX

Post Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:04 pm 
 

Deadlord39 wrote:I reported it as well. What an idiot.


Ditto.  And the fact it was removed shows we weren't the only ones who thought it was a tad, how should we say, ambiguous. Mars is right, it was just a fishing expedition....

Mike B.


"THE MORE YOU THINK ABOUT WHY i DONE WHAT i DONE THE MORE i LAUGH" Cougar
"The Acaeum hates fun" Sir Allen
"I had a collecting emergency" Nogrod
Co-founder of the North Texas RPG Con
NTRPGCON

 WWW  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 8028
Joined: Jun 23, 2003
Last Visit: Apr 21, 2024
Location: DFW TX

Post Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:06 pm 
 

serleran wrote:
Wow! Now I feel all glad I bought mine for 1/3rd that (and thought that was high.) When did this item get so expensive?


Anything Vecna related (including Die, Vecna Die and Vecna Reborn) has been rising in value lately. However, as with all auctions, I would wait to see a trend develop, since sometimes two individuals competing can drive a price far beyond it's worth. If the next one sells for $30, well....

Mike B.


"THE MORE YOU THINK ABOUT WHY i DONE WHAT i DONE THE MORE i LAUGH" Cougar
"The Acaeum hates fun" Sir Allen
"I had a collecting emergency" Nogrod
Co-founder of the North Texas RPG Con
NTRPGCON

 WWW  


Grandstanding Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 6455
Joined: Dec 13, 2004
Last Visit: Apr 20, 2023

Post Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:14 pm 
 

serleran wrote:
Wow! Now I feel all glad I bought mine for 1/3rd that (and thought that was high.) When did this item get so expensive?


It got expensive because it was in still in shirnk.  I also took into account with my bid that it would be replacing a copy that didn't have shrink(as I still collect those types of things ;)), so I would be likely selling off the one it replaced for likely half of my bid.

Sorry 'bout that Matt. :)


"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." -Neitzche

  


Grandstanding Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 6455
Joined: Dec 13, 2004
Last Visit: Apr 20, 2023

Post Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:23 pm 
 

Its back up now:




** expired/removed eBay auction **




Still very agressive opening bid though.  This time minus the objectionable langauge....


"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." -Neitzche

  


Prolific Collector

Posts: 120
Joined: Nov 10, 2005
Last Visit: Mar 18, 2022
Location: Texas

Post Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm 
 

Mars wrote:
I reported the auction as listing violation under not actually having an item for sale or something like that.  I don't think it is antithetical to what is promoted here at all.  I think one thing that is strongly promoted here is that when a rare comes up, you want to be sure that the seller is honest and you will get what you paid for.

With the auction listing as it was, there was no such guarantee that the seller would even sell it to the highest bidder.  The listing was clearly just a fishing expedition to try and get offers.


The item being relisted "minus the objectionable language" (bclarkie) doesn't mean a whole lot now of course, as the damage to the seller's veracity has already been done.  There remains the taint from the previous auction snafu...  He may very well still be fishing for offers, but just not stating it so openly now.  Which, in a way, means that the seller was being _more_ honest with the original auction, which members got pulled from eBay because it smacked of dishonesty.  Ironic.  

Has anyone here actually had a bad transaction with this seller?

bonk!

  

User avatar

Long-Winded Collector

Posts: 4753
Joined: Oct 31, 2004
Last Visit: Feb 16, 2024
Location: Caddo Mills, TX

Post Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:33 pm 
 

Does anyone know if the seller is the same person that supposedly picked up the ST1 mentioned in this thread?

viewtopic.php?t=6156&highlight=st1

I also think it kind of strange that the seller has essentially copied nearly the entire contents of the ST1 webpage from The Acaeum (including the links) and does not even mention The Acaeum anywhere in his auction description and not one single person has mentioned it in this thread.  Did anyone send an email to the seller or Ebay to complain about it?


You don't like your job, you don't strike. You go in every day and do it really half-assed. That's the American way. - Homer Simpson

  


Grandstanding Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 6455
Joined: Dec 13, 2004
Last Visit: Apr 20, 2023

Post Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:37 pm 
 

Kingofpain89 wrote:Does anyone know if the seller is the same person that supposedly picked up the ST1 mentioned in this thread?

viewtopic.php?t=6156&highlight=st1


I mentioned it in my posting for the first auction 2 pages back:

bclarkie wrote:The aforementioned(in another thread), ST1:


** expired/removed eBay auction **


Opening bid is extremely agressive though.




I would be extremely surprised if this wasn't the same guy.


"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." -Neitzche

  


Prolific Collector

Posts: 120
Joined: Nov 10, 2005
Last Visit: Mar 18, 2022
Location: Texas

Post Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:43 pm 
 

So Gary Kramer would be someone in the know...

bonk!

  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector

Posts: 6161
Joined: May 03, 2003
Last Visit: Apr 09, 2024
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Post Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 3:27 pm 
 

With the "objectionable language" removed, I would hope that seller realizes that they should sell it to the highest bidder should there be one.  If that doesn't happen and it is sold to a 3rd party after the auction finishes, then the high bidder probably has some recourse through Ebay to file a non-selling seller.  It would also say a lot about the seller's character.

I don't have any doubt that the seller is genuine and whoever is willing to pay the most will get this copy but the whole auction is just a lazy listing.  Clearly, the seller knows of the Acaeum and if they wanted to test the market could easily have posted it in the classifieds to get some offers.  Instead it is whipped up onto Ebay with the might sell it here or might sell it to someone else clause.

 WWW  


Prolific Collector

Posts: 671
Joined: Dec 17, 2005
Last Visit: Feb 13, 2019
Location: Italy

Post Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 4:35 pm 
 

bclarkie wrote:
It got expensive because it was in still in shirnk.


I got my SW copy on eBay back in January 2007 for a grand total of 49.44 USD, shipping costs and insurance included.

 ICQ  

User avatar

Prolific Collector

Posts: 565
Joined: Aug 08, 2003
Last Visit: Jul 08, 2023
Location: Chicago

Post Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 5:36 pm 
 

I didn't get the feeling that the seller wouldn't honour a winning bid on the ebay auction for the ST1 - the way I interpreted it from his words and the price it was listed at, if someone bid $2k and wins the auction, he'll sell at that price no problem.

But I don't think he was expecting to sell at that price. He knows that the "value" of an ST1 is probably $1200-1500, but he's hoping that there may be someone out there willing to pay $2k. So he listed it up - if it sells, he's pretty happy, but more realistically he expects to get offers closer to it's "worth".

Like Mars said, a better approach would be through the classifieds here. Or do what he is now doing - list at $2k without any reference to offers, as undoubtedly he'll get a bunch either way.

Regards

Mike


Demand of them whither they should comme to devide the worlde with the Emperour? And as they answered, he tooke up his shirte behinde and shewed them his buttocks, sayenge unto them, drawe your Lyne throughe the middest of *this* place.

  
PreviousNext
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies. Page 54 of 114123 ... 51, 52, 53, 54, 55 ... 112113114