g026r wrote:Which volume are they in?It's appearing that Vol. II is the hardest to get though, as I've seen several people mentioning that they have I & III, but not II. Dammit, means I'll have to fight more for it.
It's appearing that Vol. II is the hardest to get though, as I've seen several people mentioning that they have I & III, but not II.
jasonw1239 wrote:Does the write-up for Nyarlalthotep have any information about the"masks" or "thousand-faces" that appears in the later Chaosium CoC books?
g026r wrote:Which volume are they in?
"OK, so where is my Griffin Island Box Set? I still want it."
Apparently what happened was that some boxes were mislabeled. There were 13 items I shipped out, but once we discoved there was a problem, we were not sure which items were shipped incorrectly. Once the person who received your box contacts me and sends the item back, I will contact you directly and if you are still interested, we can work out an arrangment. Once again, I am very sorry for the mistake and appreciate your understanding. - mhmoretti
Aneoth wrote:I am not going to slash them yet, they seem to have simply GOOFED up.It happens.
FormCritic wrote:Hole not in box when mailed, happened during shipping.
I should have looked harder at the picture, but the seller also had some sort of ethical duty to mention a major piece of damage. Right? Or, am I just totally off base?
JohnGaunt wrote:Mentioning the gaping hole is something a nice seller does; relying on the picture is what a standard seller does; lying is what a shady seller does.
FormCritic wrote:I haven't ever posted a negative feedback and I don't know if I will now.This guy has annoyed me with his duplicity. I should have looked harder at the photograph.A halfway believable reply would have sufficed. Something like:"Yeah, the box is damaged, but the contexts are good. The photo was not intentionally misleading, and the damage can be seen if you look."The seller does offer refunds within seven days and his shipping price was just over $2.....so just a semi-honest shyster reply would have been OK.