Deadlord36 wrote:Lawrenson does. Ask him for a description and some pics.
FoulFoot wrote:Hmmm. I'm a bit suspicious too. Can you get hold of a microscope? A regular tabletop / science-class variety will do. Under magnification, you can discern the printing method: 1) ink-jet printing has dots of equal size.2) laser / photocopy printing also has dots (actually, collections of toner dust), but they are irregular in size. There will also be a random scatter of very small dust (toner) particles.3) offset printing, which is what all D&D modules (and most commercial printing) is produced with, has a very flat appearance with even coverage of ink and sharp edges. No dots.This may help you figure out if it's counterfeit or not. Most counterfeiters are not going to have access to an offset press, since they're still quite expensive. The danger is that an owner of a legitimate ST1 decides to make a few extras -- D&D modules are not all that difficult to replicate, especially ones without full-color covers.Foul
lawrenson wrote:Hino, I'm not Italian, I'm English.Personally, I don't think they posted it the first time (and no, I have no idea why not).If I was a seller who'd just lost a thousand-dollar module in the post, I would be VERY upset.I don't think I would replace it that quickly, when there was hope that it would turn up, and a couple of weeks from Canada is not that long.Just my opinion.Glad it arrived safely tho. Cheers,Malcolm
Deadlord36 wrote:From the sounds of it, I don't think they'll mind much. They'll just print off another.There's way too many weird things going on here, Sot. Have you had a chance to check the module out?
jagd wrote:Is the second copy in as good condition as the first (as it was described in the listing)?It is an old trick. Describe something as being in great condition. Get agreat price for it. But oh look it got lost in the mail. I do have a second copy but it is not as quite good as the first...But at least you get your item while I've sold 2 items for the price of one...