FormCritic wrote:For instance, would Unearthed Arcana be a good thing or a bad thing? Or, would the DM use parts of Unearthed Arcana while disallowing other parts?
red_bus wrote:I am a big fan of UA weapon specialisation - it gives fighters an advantage that paladins and rangers don't have - and also against the rising relative advantage of spell using classes as levels rise. It is a sizeable advantage - but not too difficult for the DM to adapt to.UA had some sensible new spells too. I wasn't too happy about the Barbarian - most people managed to play Barbarians by tinkering with fighters (you can do a lot of what it is intended to do with some simple homebrew adaptations). And the Cavalier was banned by everyone I played with.
killjoy32 wrote:i think if Rob was DMing it would be along the lines of OD&D rules imo....Al
FormCritic wrote:How do guys who like the old game deal with different interpretations and iterations of AD&D?
FormCritic wrote:IF Rob were to use OD&D rules, how would he explain his particular version of the rules to his convention open play players?What supplements would he use or not use?Since OD&D has been in a deep freeze for 30 years, how would anyone know what to do or where to look?
Guido-the-Gypsy wrote:Sorry to interupt happy thoughts. The Highway 35W bridge that crosses the Mississippi River, here in Minneapolis, MN collapsed (about 1/2 mile from my home). There were up to 300 cars on the bridge at the time of collapse. Can't reach two of my gaming buddies that we coming over to game tonight. They use that bridge to get here and should have been here right at the time the bridge collapsed. Please think of us here in Minneapolis tonight. Thanks all.
Gov. Tim Pawlenty said inspections of the 40-year-old bridge in 2005 and 2006 found no structural defects, but a 2001 study conducted by the Minnesota Department of Transportation found "several fatigue problems" in the bridge's approach spans and "poor fatigue details" on the main truss.The study suggested that the design of bridge's main truss could cause a collapse if one of two support planes were to become cracked, although it allowed that a collapse might not occur in that event. But, the study concluded, "fatigue cracking of the deck truss is not likely" and "replacement of the bridge ... may be deferred."