Badmike wrote:ROMO......ROMO.......ROMO....ROMO!!!!If you had the Cowboys QB in your fantasy league, or in real life, you are living large right now!!!!!Cowboys 45, Giants 35Romo had one single mistep, a bad INT in the 2nd half, but otherwise put up 345 yds and 4 TDs. The offense looks great...the defense, eh, they better get a LOT better unless they plan on scoring 40+ pts every week.But being 1-0 on a week when you beat a NFC East rival, AND the Beagles lose, is sweet...!Mike B.
jasonw1239 wrote:I was surprised that T.O. wasn't throwing a tantrum on the sidelines by the end of the first half! Must have been something mentioned at half-time since Romo hit T.O. for a touchdown early in the second half.
Kingofpain89 wrote:No kidding....Romo looked almost unbeatable. So much for all the critics who said he was a fluke. I was also impressed that pansy boy Eli Manning actually played as well as he did. He was lucky though. Did Dallas actually blitz once last night? And I thought it was hilarious every time John Madden said "Why didnt he throw it to Plaxico? He was wide open." Apparently Plaxico was wondering the same thing.If Dallas is going to stand a chance against anyone else they better get their secondary problems fixed and quick. Roy Williams looked like a lost puppy out there last night.
Xaxaxe wrote:Gleemax in trouble already:http://www.gleemax.com/articles/announcement016.htmlWotC can't seem to get all their drones on the same page? I'm stunned. Stunned, I say!
FormCritic wrote:Aren't Big 10 schools totally accustomed to going to the Rose Bowl and losing?
g026r wrote:I've used Agile and Scrum. It's an interesting methodology, but like anything it's got its downsides... Not the least being that you can end up going around in circles or just spinning your wheels if the customer can't make up their mind. That said, I'd like to hope that bit about delaying launch because they'd rather a quality launch than an on-time launch isn't just marketing spin. The D&D brand may have a lot of clout, but they're still going to have to make a product enough people will actually want to use if they're going to hope to make a profit from this.
Kingofpain89 wrote:Bleh...I was going to attempt to argue against your point with statistics and unbiased evidence...but it would take a very long time to dig up all that, and I just dont have the time to do so. So I will just say this: Without USC the Pac 10 would be a second tier conference. And how can anyone say that the Pac 10 is better than the Big Ten? The Big Ten has eleven teams! That automatically makes them the better conference.God! Pac 10 fans need to shut up.
FormCritic wrote:USC is just the current dominant team.
killjoy32 wrote:USC?you guys need to remember that there is a worldwide audience here.....need to help us understand all these codes man!
JohnGaunt wrote:University of Southern California . . . the Trojans!
ESPNEWS reports that the Browns have found a taker for Charlie Frye: Seattle. Terms of the deal are not yet known, but Frye is expected to be the No. 3/emergency QB for the Seahawks for the rest of the season. Derek Anderson is expected to start for the Browns in Week 2 vs. Cincinnati.
benjoshua wrote:USC for lots of people is University of South Carolina in Columbia, SC. Not that I'm a fan or anything.