The Expanded Editorial of Jim Perelman's 1st Ed PHB
Post new topic Reply to topic Page 6 of 19123, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 171819
Author

User avatar

Verbose Collector
JG Valuation Board

Posts: 1665
Joined: Jul 01, 2006
Last Visit: Jan 23, 2021
Location: Moncton, NB Canada

Post Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 10:54 pm 
 

Zip the scanned images, change the .zip to .avi and dump it to a photobucket account and post the link that we can right click on, save to our computer and then changed the .avi extension back to .zip  :P


Check out my Chaosium sourcebook.
Secrets of Tibet

  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 6720
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Last Visit: Jul 24, 2020

Post Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 1:33 am 
 

jasonw1239 wrote:Zip the scanned images, change the .zip to .avi and dump it to a photobucket account and post the link that we can right click on, save to our computer and then changed the .avi extension back to .zip  :P


OK...zip?  avi?   photobucket account?  avi extension?

I do know how to post a link, but as far as the rest of the internet goes I am as ignorant as one of those headhunters on Gilligan's Island.   :x

PM with address sent, by the way.


"But I have watched the dragons come, fire-eyed, across the world."

  

User avatar

Verbose Collector

Posts: 1026
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Last Visit: Nov 26, 2020
Location: Huntsville, Ala.

Post Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 8:20 am 
 

jasonw1239 wrote:Zip the scanned images, change the .zip to .avi and dump it to a photobucket account and post the link that we can right click on, save to our computer and then changed the .avi extension back to .zip  :P


I don't know how to convert zip to avi, and I don't have a photobucket account ... in fact, I'm not even sure what a photobucket account is.

Maybe someone else who's received the CD can do this.

Thanks,
Keith


"Not all those who wander are lost." ~ J.R.R. Tolkien

  

User avatar

Verbose Collector
JG Valuation Board

Posts: 1665
Joined: Jul 01, 2006
Last Visit: Jan 23, 2021
Location: Moncton, NB Canada

Post Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 8:46 am 
 

I just meant to change the extensions, not convert the file. Forget about it. The basic settings in Windows hides file extensions anyway.

on another note:

REH!! You're back!!  :P
Man...got to tell you...your other avatar was really creeping me out.
I clearly remember the shadow that the Dallas Egbert incident cast on the reputation of gaming.
Anybody that was gaming at that time had to be on the defensive and explain role playing repeatedly.


Check out my Chaosium sourcebook.
Secrets of Tibet

  

User avatar

Sage Collector

Posts: 2332
Joined: Feb 20, 2006
Last Visit: Aug 27, 2017
Location: Shipwrecked by the laughter of the gods

Post Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 8:50 am 
 

jasonw1239 wrote:Zip the scanned images, change the .zip to .avi and dump it to a photobucket account and post the link that we can right click on, save to our computer and then changed the .avi extension back to .zip  :P

What he is describing is a sneaky way to transfer files.

(1) Photobucket is a place that stores photos and movies for free.  Anyone can access the photos and movies if given a link.

(2) The filenames of movies end in suffixes like "mpeg", "mov", and "avi" --- JasonzBdayParty.avi

(3) The filenames of compressed files end in suffixes like "Z", "bz2", "gz", and "zip" --- JasonzBdayParty.zip

(4) Photobucket apparently only checks filesizes and filename extensions.  Big file + named like a movie = OK, it's a movie file.

So all that's required by the uploader is being a bit naughty (as opposed to being a naughty bit) and uploading a faux-movie file that in reality is a compressed file that contains a bunch of scans.

Whoever downloads the file then renames it so Windows knows to play it with whatever movie player plays avi files.

[edit: *d'oh*  That last bit should read

Whoever downloads the file then renames it so Windows knows to uncompress it with whatever compression program is on the machine.  Windows compression, WinZip, 7Zip, etc will uncompress the file into its component parts. ]


Last edited by JohnGaunt on Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
  


Prolific Collector

Posts: 195
Joined: Mar 31, 2006
Last Visit: Jan 23, 2009
Location: UK

Post Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 10:54 am 
 

John> now that is sneaky sneaky.


"Somehow, in hell I knew there would be mushrooms"

 WWW  

User avatar

Verbose Collector

Posts: 1026
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Last Visit: Nov 26, 2020
Location: Huntsville, Ala.

Post Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 3:29 pm 
 

The hard copy of the PHB is now on its way to Mark (formcritic).

As Jimmy Buffett says, "Good God Almighty, it's a piece of work!"

Thanks ...
Keith


"Not all those who wander are lost." ~ J.R.R. Tolkien

  

User avatar

Verbose Collector

Posts: 1026
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Last Visit: Nov 26, 2020
Location: Huntsville, Ala.

Post Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 9:16 pm 
 

BTW, with respect to the CD, there should be a few copies out and about by now.

If, however, you are having trouble getting your hands on one, PM me sometime next week (preferably Tuesday or later) and I'll try to help ...

Keith


"Not all those who wander are lost." ~ J.R.R. Tolkien

  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 6720
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Last Visit: Jul 24, 2020

Post Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 2:19 am 
 

So...I hold in my hand Jim Perelman's legendary Players Handbook (first edition, I believe).  

Interesting to note that Jim's age is written beside his name in a different handwriting from his own.  The handwriting matches the notation on the facing endpage that this is "Carole Perelman's book."  

Could Carole Perelman be a sister?  

The notation about Jim's age implies that Carole noted it down some time later...possibly as a humorous note about the age at which her brother composed such an infamous rant?

Is it also significant that Carole Perelman's name is written below (and therefore later than?) the notation, "RETURN TO HAWK"?

It looks as if someone tried to white-out "RETURN TO HAWK" but then wiped it away before it could dry?

Who wrote "ATTILA THE HUN" above Jim's rant on the right inside front cover sheet?  It looks like they covered over an old notation.

Aside from Jim's rant, the notations and rule changes inside are at least consistent.  He wanted to make some of the classes less powerful (like they were before AD&D) and he did not like some of the spell descriptions.

Significantly, Jim Perelman's notations all upgrade the monk.

I tend to agree with some of his changes.

Aenoth's CD is inside the front cover.

I signed it today.  Future signers should add the date to their signatures.

OK - Who's next?


"But I have watched the dragons come, fire-eyed, across the world."

  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 7942
Joined: Jun 23, 2003
Last Visit: Jan 23, 2021
Location: DFW TX

Post Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 2:57 am 
 

FormCritic wrote:So...I hold in my hand Jim Perelman's legendary Players Handbook (first edition, I believe).  

Interesting to note that Jim's age is written beside his name in a different handwriting from his own.  The handwriting matches the notation on the facing endpage that this is "Carole Perelman's book."  

Could Carole Perelman be a sister?  

The notation about Jim's age implies that Carole noted it down some time later...possibly as a humorous note about the age at which her brother composed such an infamous rant?

Is it also significant that Carole Perelman's name is written below (and therefore later than?) the notation, "RETURN TO HAWK"?

It looks as if someone tried to white-out "RETURN TO HAWK" but then wiped it away before it could dry?

Who wrote "ATTILA THE HUN" above Jim's rant on the right inside front cover sheet?  It looks like they covered over an old notation.

Aside from Jim's rant, the notations and rule changes inside are at least consistent.  He wanted to make some of the classes less powerful (like they were before AD&D) and he did not like some of the spell descriptions.

Significantly, Jim Perelman's notations all upgrade the monk.

I tend to agree with some of his changes.

Aenoth's CD is inside the front cover.

I signed it today.  Future signers should add the date to their signatures.

OK - Who's next?


He tried to turn AD&D back to original D&D..

My question would be, instead of doing all that work, why not just play original D&D?  :D

Mike B.


"THE MORE YOU THINK ABOUT WHY i DONE WHAT i DONE THE MORE i LAUGH" Cougar
"The Acaeum hates fun" Sir Allen
"I had a collecting emergency" Nogrod
Co-founder of the North Texas RPG Con
http://www.ntrpgcon.com

 WWW  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 6720
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Last Visit: Jul 24, 2020

Post Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 3:15 am 
 

OK...well...the weapon speed factor chart does indeed "smoke farty eggs."

One of the problems with sticking to an older version of the game is that you cannot write for the game unless you are up to date....and Jim Perelman's comments and writing skills tend to indicate to me that he was thinking about publishing.

Another problem is that the game passes you by and there are no more tournaments, magazine articles and published modules to support you.

A third problem is that you encounter other players who want to use the new rules...and you either comply, argue or sit out.

One other interesting thing about Jim Perelman's rant is that part of his rant appears to be directed at one of the supplement books, because he references the Gods, Demi-gods and Heroes booklet.  The AD&D version is called just Gods and Demigods.

Jim obviously loved the game enough to rewrite sections of the Players Handbook to fit his needs.  I like him.   :D

Mark


"But I have watched the dragons come, fire-eyed, across the world."

  


Sage Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 2884
Joined: Nov 04, 2004
Last Visit: May 09, 2020

Post Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 4:50 am 
 

FormCritic wrote:OK - Who's next?

I'd like to take a look, but, honestly, I'm sure sure if I'm at the front or the back of the queue. This thread has had enough stops and starts that I've sort of lost track of the details.

If I am at the back of the line, it's no biggie. I'm sure it will get here eventually.  :)

 WWW  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 6720
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Last Visit: Jul 24, 2020

Post Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 10:49 am 
 

I don't know of a line or where it is formed.  PM me your address.


"But I have watched the dragons come, fire-eyed, across the world."

  

User avatar

Verbose Collector

Posts: 1026
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Last Visit: Nov 26, 2020
Location: Huntsville, Ala.

Post Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 11:50 am 
 

FormCritic wrote:One of the problems with sticking to an older version of the game is that you cannot write for the game unless you are up to date....

Another problem is that the game passes you by and there are no more tournaments, magazine articles and published modules to support you.

A third problem is that you encounter other players who want to use the new rules...and you either comply, argue or sit out.


I tried to keep my players interested in OD&D also.  I went so far as to photocopy the 3 orig rulebooks and the 3 supplements and collate them into a single rulebook.

But, for the reasons Mark mentioned, there was just no interest.  None of our players wanted to use an "old" set of the rules.

Plus, we'd also get new players who'd never seen the OD&D material ... all they knew were the AD&D books.

So I gave up and just ran AD&D, using OD&D concepts where and when I could.


"Not all those who wander are lost." ~ J.R.R. Tolkien

  


Sage Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 2884
Joined: Nov 04, 2004
Last Visit: May 09, 2020

Post Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 2:09 pm 
 

FormCritic wrote:I don't know of a line or where it is formed.  PM me your address.

Then I feel compelled to add: "woot!" I thought maybe I'd be 13th in the queue or something.

Address sent. I will instruct my postman to give the package the respect it deserves.

 WWW  


Prolific Collector

Posts: 195
Joined: Mar 31, 2006
Last Visit: Jan 23, 2009
Location: UK

Post Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 7:20 am 
 

I've never seen od&d either I admit.. I feel so young.. lol. I have a similar problem with AD&D vs 3.5 though. I love running planescape but converting it's a pain in the arse, i'd rather just run it in ad&d but noone wants to play ad&d... so sad. it's not thaaaat complecated... heheh..

Ooo, and keep us posted about the onlineness of the scans. I wanna see this masterpiece


"Somehow, in hell I knew there would be mushrooms"

 WWW  

User avatar

Prolific Collector

Posts: 851
Joined: Jun 12, 2004
Last Visit: Dec 29, 2020

Post Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:42 am 
 

Keith the Thief wrote:I tried to keep my players interested in OD&D also.  I went so far as to photocopy the 3 orig rulebooks and the 3 supplements and collate them into a single rulebook.

When you say collate, do you mean putting all the books together into one big book, or did you actually take pieces from the supplements and put them where they belonged in the main book?

If the former, you have a game that is unwieldly if every single option is utilized.  Presented with so many different options will make people do a double-take.  After all, OD&D, while simple enough to play is an unorganized mess presentation-wise.  For example, hit locations from Blackmoor is a prime example of a system that added no tangible benefit to the game, and it's easy to see why it wasn't put into AD&D.  The Holmes Basic rule book didn't help matters.  I believe if the system was properly edited in 1976-1977 instead of being hacked down into a 48 page book (Holmes Basic Rule Book), I believe more people might give the old rule set a try and see just how similar to AD&D the final product actually became, when the most cruddy of the rules were excised from the text.

If it's the latter, I'd be curious to see your effort and compare it to mine, just to see what you kept in the core rules versus what you took out.



  

User avatar

Verbose Collector

Posts: 1026
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Last Visit: Nov 26, 2020
Location: Huntsville, Ala.

Post Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 7:02 pm 
 

Traveller wrote:When you say collate, do you mean putting all the books together into one big book, or did you actually take pieces from the supplements and put them where they belonged in the main book?

If it's the latter, I'd be curious to see your effort and compare it to mine, just to see what you kept in the core rules versus what you took out.


It is the latter.  After photocopying everything, I took the parts from the supplements and copied and pasted (or Scotch-taped, to be more precise) equivalent sections together.  So, for instance, I took the monsters section from M&T and combined it with monster listings from GH, BM and EW.

I didn't use all the rules.  I distinctly remember excluding the BM combat tables and the EW psionics section.

I wish I had my compiled OD&D "book" to share, but I don't think I have it any longer.  While there's an outside chance that it's still in some obscure box among all of my parents' belongings in a storage unit, my guess is that it was lost, stolen, or thrown away by accident.   :(

Keith


"Not all those who wander are lost." ~ J.R.R. Tolkien

  

User avatar

Prolific Collector

Posts: 851
Joined: Jun 12, 2004
Last Visit: Dec 29, 2020

Post Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 11:56 pm 
 

Mine went beyond the OD&D books, in that I used things from virtually every edition of Dungeons & Dragons as well as some items (in less developed form) from The Strategic Review and Dragon magazines, and even a couple things from the SRD.  That's why I refer to mine as "Advanced Dungeons & Dragons Light" in the introduction to the book.  To me though, despite the things I added or changed, it's still OD&D because even with what got added or changed, I believe I managed to avoid taking away the things that made the OD&D game great.  One thing that unfortunately did get lost in all the editing was an intangible, but something I could deal with: the charm of 5 1/2" by 8 1/2" stapled booklets in a cardboard box.

I didn't go old school (cut and paste) in putting mine together.  I used a computer, and in doing so corrected as many grammar and spelling errors that I could find.  Obviously, the final result is in PDF, though I've not printed it out right now because I actually intend to have it bound in hardcover.



  

User avatar

Verbose Collector

Posts: 1026
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Last Visit: Nov 26, 2020
Location: Huntsville, Ala.

Post Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 8:08 am 
 

"AD&D Light" is a good description.  Although, in my case, we never played with it ... everyone in my group wanted to use the real AD&D books, so my version just sat there on the bookcase.

Traveller wrote:One thing that unfortunately did get lost in all the editing was an intangible, but something I could deal with: the charm of 5 1/2" by 8 1/2" stapled booklets in a cardboard box.


I agree.  I never could figure out why I loved those little books, but that was definitely an aspect of my own hybrid version, which was 8-1/2 x 11, that I missed.

Traveller wrote:I didn't go old school (cut and paste) in putting mine together.  I used a computer ...


I created mine in 1982 and I didn't have access to a computer.  So I had to go old school, at my old school, as it were.

Keith


"Not all those who wander are lost." ~ J.R.R. Tolkien

  
PreviousNext
Post new topic Reply to topic Page 6 of 19123, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 171819