bombadil wrote:I think we should rouse Hugh from his peaceful slumber. Lot of sellers out there he might like to visit.
bombadil wrote:S/W Chainmail, no bids: ** expired/removed eBay auction **Go for it, damn you! Go for it I say!
NetRodent wrote:I've always assumed that when one of these shows up in shrinkwrap that it was a recent shrink-job. Is there any evidence that these were originally sold in shrinkwrap?
Mars wrote:One looks like the article from Dragon magazine and the other is from the internet somewhere I think. I would doubt any claim at an authentic manuscript here.
Kires1 wrote:Does anyone else think it's a bit counter intuitive to demand that positive feedback be left first by the buyer and then, after that by the seller?
Kires1 wrote:Or as Tim the Tool Man Taylor once said, "How about I wipe my ass first and then take a sh_t!"
Kires1 wrote:I understand that it's a common practice Xax, I just think it's a strange one. Like, maybe the next time I go out to dinner, I'll leave the tip first and then order my food...
Kires1 wrote:Thanks for the links B, interesting point of views! Now back to reality.....how much should I throw down on that R4......
Blackmoor wrote:R4 is really common, wait for a better price