zhowar wrote:One clarification before everyone posts their lists. Do only fully published modules count? That is, no adventures from Dragon magazine, Dungeon magazine, or Sample Dungeons (Zenopus, Haunted Keep, etc)?
The Collector's Trove wrote:Howdy Brian,I really think that modules should be seperate. No combos save T1-4 being considered as T2, and T1 being seperate.For example A1, A2, A3, and A4 are all very different and should be considered seperately. Maybe the combo modules should be rated in a seperate poll?I just think the poll will be as weak as the one Paizo did unless folks are restricted to rating individual modules. Many folks said it was a copout to rate them that way.Futures Bright,Paul
Afrika Corps wrote: mean has anyone ever Dmed Ravenloft I6? Boring... zzzzzzz.
mbassoc2003 wrote:Are we talking about TSR published modules only?
grodog wrote:Ian beat me to the question, Brian: you do say PotVQ's OK, but it's obviously linked to TSR via distribution. Is your intent that only the modules listed on the site @ http://www.acaeum.com/ddindexes/modcode.html be eligible for the poll (i.e., PotVQ is OK, Misy Isles isn't)?
aia wrote:10.) dead gods (is it a super module???)