Beyondthebreach wrote:I can hardly think of a negative thing to say about them. You can do no wrong!
Reindeergamez wrote:It's funny you mention this, I was just noticing the same thing, doing a full inventory on my stock (Because it's the end of the year and it's been a LONG time) and I'm finding MANY items that I thought were listed that apparently had "timed out" despite my listing through Blackthorne with GTC as my choice. Finding a TON of these in my slow categories especially, because I would never have noticed say a "GURPS" book that hadn't moved in 6 months since they sell so slowly anyway. I have "caught" many of these problems through time in my quickly moving categories and at the time probably just blew them off as a personal error in missing relisting a duplicate item but now I wonder...
Hmm, maybe the problem is with Blackthorne? I don't use it and I don't have those issues . . .
improvstone wrote:Something I just found out .. ebay doesn't let you add fedback after a user becaome unregistered.What a great way for ebay to limit the amount a negative feedback and thus show the real damage the user caused.
killjoy32 wrote:yes i have noticed that before myself - it makes you wonder what their "think tank" is doing at the best of times really doesnt it?Al
improvstone wrote:Something I just found out .. ebay doesn't let you add fedback after a user becaome unregistered.
Xaxaxe wrote:I'm not looking to fan any flames or anything, but I have to admit that I don't see the problem here.One thing about eBay declaring someone NARU: it is permanent. That person is done. Nothing anyone else can say — whether through positive or negative feedback — can change that. It's already over. So it seems sort of pointless to me to worry about adding to the feedback file of a user who is literally out of the picture.+++++For the record, though, I've wanted to do this a couple of times in the past, so I can certainly understand the urge to do it. I'm just saying eBay's policy seems logical enough to me.
Deadlord39 wrote:Don't do it. The rules, and the benefits of following them, AND the risks of not doing so, are very clear.
improvstone wrote:Guys Some advice please.My better half has just started using ebay and recently won an item. She payed for it via paypal. Soon after the seller sent a message to her stating that the paypal account she sent the money to was wrong and that she should sent to another email account via paypal.I checked the money was unclaimed which it was. Cancelled the payment then sent a response to the seller stating that if the payment was in error it was because they had incorrectly setup their ebay account. Fix the ebay account and payment would be resubmitted once the funds from the cancelled payment were recredited. The seller has since responded 1st with the same message via ebay then with a request for payment direct from paypal to this other account. Given that the seller has not responded to two separate messages, except to send another invoice, I do not trust them. Why would a seller not want to have the ebay account connected to the correct paypal account?
Wandering Monster wrote:Hi everyone,I've been putting Bidpay as a payment option in my eBay auctions ever since I started on eBay over seven years ago.Then tonight I stumble on this forum post saying that Bidpay went out of business and that eBay is randomly pulling auctions that list Bidpay and/or its logo as a method of payment. However, I've never had this happen, and I recently had a buyer pay via Bidpay with no problems. However, I have noticed that Bidpay no longer issues actual money orders but instead transfers the money directly into my bank account.Can someone please let me know what the scoop is with Bidpay and eBay these days???Thanks,JohnHaka Wandering Monster
Badmike wrote:I haven't had a buyer use Bidpay in many years. I'd say it's not worth the chance Ebay pulls your listing to have it listed as a method of payment.Mike B.
