Gradek wrote:What really matters for future value is going to be the quality of the product.
Gradek wrote:What really matters for future value is going to be the quality of the product. If this recreates 1st edition adventuring to its pure form, it will be valuable and sell other modules. If it is crap, no one will buy the others and this will fall into obscurity. My belief is that Rob in fact can recapture 1982, but I only bought one copy, as I am more of a gamer than collector.
mbassoc2003 wrote:That is not proven out. Many of the rare and valuable D&D products are rare and valuable because they are crap. No-one bought them at the time.
killjoy32 wrote:absolutely correct. some of the biggest rares are a little pile of sh*te. i have runic copies and for me, i couldnt care less if they have future value or not. i bought them because i support the effort.to me, they will have more meaning than just potential value.Al
mbassoc2003 wrote:That's just 'cos you earn so much doing our regular job.
dbartman wrote:Otherwise it's purely to resell, which I don't think was the intent.
faro wrote:.... Thanks for telling me my intention and telling Rob his intention, though.
Mars wrote:Depends on what you mean by value. What is their value now?I have 2 runic copies of Tower of Blood pre-ordered, anyone want to swap one for a runic copy of Cairn of the Skeleton King?
Marlith wrote:You have to hate it when that happens
MShipley88 wrote:Is a runic of Tower of Blood equal to a runic of Cairn of the Skeleton King?
dbartman wrote: Does a collector really need to have more than a couple? Otherwise it's purely to resell, which I don't think was the intent.
MShipley88 wrote:And, of course, there is also the chance that the runic copy collectors will be left with items that turn out to be of little value.Mark