grodog wrote:Another missing image Paul:http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... 4&rd=1&ssp agename=STRK%3AMEBI%3AIT&rd=1
stratochamp wrote:congratulations to david & allan for their great wins tonight !
faro wrote:Oh, and btw, very belated congrats on the City of Greyhawk notes from last time around. Can't blame you for not getting back to me on that after I discovered the "hidden secrets" therein (post-auction). That one's a gem!
faro wrote:Allan; good luck picking up the rest of Castle Greyhawk should EGG wish to part with that, some time...
bbarsh wrote:mud2guard wrote:The manuscript for "WG5 lost city of the Elders" looks like a real gem, crying out to be turned into a polished version. Is there any chance this could be turned into a published module or get into dungeon? Even if someone got all the manuscriipts they'd find it impossible to run it withthe same kind of vision that you could get from a finished version...MikeAgain, anything that is not v3.5 d20 can not be published without specific permission. I know there seems to be some sort of rationalization by other members here, but you just can't go and publish a 1e module...at least not without making it some sort of bland generic fantasy rpg supplement.Am I wrong here?
mud2guard wrote:The manuscript for "WG5 lost city of the Elders" looks like a real gem, crying out to be turned into a polished version. Is there any chance this could be turned into a published module or get into dungeon? Even if someone got all the manuscriipts they'd find it impossible to run it withthe same kind of vision that you could get from a finished version...Mike