PurpleDragon wrote:I think there is a big difference between making photocopies and giving them to a friends/acquaintance as opposed to making copies and then trying to sell them. The whole "you are compensating me for the time and effort I have spent gathering and copying the item" just never holds water. Personally, I think this seller with the photocopies would be far better served just not even mentioning the photocopies and just including them with the package. He is not going to see any extra bidding because of the copies, so why even bother bringing up the potential hassle of having people e-mailing him and complaining.
He doesn't specifically say he has a photocopied B1 or anything...he just says photocopied scenarios. They could be pieces of crap he wrote up himself, then photocopied. Unless you buy the lot and see for yourself, or ask him, there's no way of knowing. And he also skirts a fine line by saying "bonus" in the description....in other words, he isn't selling them, he's just including them in the lot.
Personally, I think this seller with the photocopies would be far better served just not even mentioning the photocopies and just including them with the package. He is not going to see any extra bidding because of the copies, so why even bother bringing up the potential hassle of having people e-mailing him and complaining.
beyondthebreach wrote:So, I guess the point I am driving at is this: this guy's vague description essentially protects him, but if he (or someone else) came right out and stated the photocopied names of TSR/WOTC items they were including should they be reported? In a case like this - definitely "No". Judgement must be exercised to stop only those who are blatantly selling copyrighted materials or making them a substantial part of their auction.
Terminal_Frost wrote:Is it possible this is legal?http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... 28962&rd=1
Kosh Vorlontay wrote:Are these copies or actual?cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem& ... 2&rd=1