Deadlord39 wrote:She did.
Deadlord39 wrote:Surly has the proper attitude.I get a kick out of the "no violation" statement, but no list of the material.
killjoy32 wrote:well basically all he had to do was list the stuff that was on the CD - simple as - that would be more than justified proof, yes?by the mere fact that he hasnt, implies that he is guilty because he doesnt want to reveal the details!Al
aia wrote:oleeeee: ** expired/removed eBay auction **...is there any british fellow who want to have some fun with this?
Deadlord39 wrote:Of course. Go by the half rule, Lucy.