jamesmishler wrote:If the auction posted that the item would be sent by media mail, the buyer should have known not to have the seller send it by media mail. In this case, the extra should be paid by the buyer, as it is what he should have paid in the first place, anyway.If the seller did not post that he would be shipping via media mail, and then ships via media mail without the buyer's knowledge, the seller should pay back the buyer the extra costs; he tried to pull one over on the buyer and the USPS, and got caught. If he doesn't pay the buyer for the additional costs, he should get a negative with the reason why.
VermilionFire wrote:Let me add this additional information: I paid $7.45 for shipping, but the package only cost a little over $4 via media mail (as indicated on the box when the seller originally sent it). I did not know how the seller was going to send the package, just that I would pay $7.45, which I did. The box was a used box and it was packed with old, crumpled newspapers so not extra handling fee there.
The Collector's Trove wrote:Howdy,That is why I don't use media mail anymore. It is a pain. Occasionally, I get a guy who has never seen me before at the PO and they actually ask me to open a package. Sorry but I don't have all day to stand at the PO opening and closing packages, especially when I have 50-60 of them.Paul
jpipes wrote:I tend to think at the very least the two parties should split the cost when this happens.