bonk! wrote:Shirtless demon-helmed Arch-Mage fondling the breast of his female assistant, while also suggesting that he might like to "cut both ways" by embracing his Orcish male retainer!
Adam Shultz wrote:Considering some of the other things erol has produced nothing he produced was w/o some thought. Pick up Alma Mater some time if you want to see some really lude artworks of his. Clearly that hand was place there on purpose. Swinging both ways?.....I dont think so.
MShipley88 wrote:Of course, now I MUST know what was on the cover of White Dwarf #5! :twisted:
nn wrote:WD#5 work unsafe?
jpipes wrote:Personally, I've never been offended by the suggested/potential sexual overtones in any of the various D&D related artworks, but what HAS always annoyed me is the (in my opinion) totally silly "girl with huge breasts in a thong and chain mail bra" topic of painting. It's just plain silly. I can think of at least 5 or 6 prominent works that had this as the focus, and I hated them all. I just never got it...
guerret wrote:When I begin thinking like some things said in this thread, then I know it's time to quit roleplaying for a while and dedicate myself to women.
jpipes wrote:...but what HAS always annoyed me is the (in my opinion) totally silly "girl with huge breasts in a thong and chain mail bra" topic of painting. It's just plain silly. I can think of at least 5 or 6 prominent works that had this as the focus, and I hated them all. I just never got it...