deimos3428 wrote:Been waiting through the upgrade period to post this one:"Mint" Tsojconth - $1895. http://cgi.ebay.ca/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vie ... %3AIT&rd=1
afoolandhis$ wrote:Actually, that was a mint "Tsojonth"...
Badmike wrote: What did the last Tso go for??? Interested in comparing if the price went up or down, or if the mispelling affected the final price.
bclarkie wrote:Well, I must say that I completely missed that one. IIRC the last one Howard<lumberjaques> sold went for $1825 whenever a2jeff pushed up on that bidder who came out of nowhere and hasnt been seen or heard from since.
harami2000 wrote:bclarkie wrote:Well, I must say that I completely missed that one. IIRC the last one Howard<lumberjaques> sold went for $1825 whenever a2jeff pushed up on that bidder who came out of nowhere and hasnt been seen or heard from since.Was that not lumberjacques again? Auction dated 30th August 2005 with "Tsojonth" spelling. Have the full details somewhere...Yeah, rampant "must have" bidding, IIRC.The more recent one; "NM, but for that single short split" ($919, not $911 actually) was 30th September 2005;http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... 8700187134And the $500 (/$525) off-eBay sale was December 2005.
The current value of this module is unknown because it is so rare that none have been know to have been sold since 1996.
harami2000 wrote:bclarkie wrote:Sadly, unless something changed dramatically...I know that, but I don't think that was requested to be advertised for obvious reasons!
bclarkie wrote:Sadly, unless something changed dramatically...
harami2000 wrote:bclarkie wrote:harami2000 wrote:bclarkie wrote:Sadly, unless something changed dramatically...I know that, but I don't think that was requested to be advertised for obvious reasons!Would this be a good time for an edit? Perhaps so, Brian. Some people prefer other high-rolling bidders not to know such things!
bclarkie wrote:harami2000 wrote:bclarkie wrote:Sadly, unless something changed dramatically...I know that, but I don't think that was requested to be advertised for obvious reasons!Would this be a good time for an edit?
bclarkie wrote:Well it is now edited for your protection.
bclarkie wrote:I find it rather interesting though that the last 2 from lumberjaques have gone to bidders with low feedback that no one seems to know. I do think that you are correct about the spelling error too. Sadly, <edited for your protection>
deimos3428 wrote:Honestly, a lot of these rare auctions are making me paranoid... It seems slightly fishy that someone who worked on Tsojconth would spell it incorrectly, and repeatedly so. And that someone that knew what it was worth would provide such poor scans. (Didn't stop me from bidding, though.)
tfm wrote:As for the sudden spike in near mint rares, I personally doubt the oft-repeated scenario that unsolds were destroyed.
harami2000 wrote:Why destroy what you've paid to have printed?
deimos3428 wrote:Honestly, a lot of these rare auctions are making me paranoid. The prices keep skyrocketing, they all claim to be mint, and they're coming in pairs. I'm not going to tell anyone what to bid/not bid on, here's a few observations.It seems slightly fishy that someone who worked on Tsojconth would spell it incorrectly, and repeatedly so. And that someone that knew what it was worth would provide such poor scans. (Didn't stop me from bidding, though.)And multiple Fazzlewoods just seems really unlikely, authenticity letter or not. In fact, the authenticity letter almost backfires, in my opinion. Anyone else concerned?