mbassoc2003 wrote:harami2000 wrote:mbassoc2003 wrote:So if you're goint to spend $1500+ on a mint digest book, how are you going to confirm its real? Or is the chance to read it worth $1500 alone?Hey, remember the $200 OCE context from the last time you quoted that, Ian! I don't remember, but at least with OCEs you can compare like with like relatively easily.
harami2000 wrote:mbassoc2003 wrote:So if you're goint to spend $1500+ on a mint digest book, how are you going to confirm its real? Or is the chance to read it worth $1500 alone?Hey, remember the $200 OCE context from the last time you quoted that, Ian!
mbassoc2003 wrote:So if you're goint to spend $1500+ on a mint digest book, how are you going to confirm its real? Or is the chance to read it worth $1500 alone?
mbassoc2003 wrote:In years to come, we'll look back and think 'I remember when you could get an orange B3 for $1500, and OCE sets were $200 a pop!'
killjoy32 wrote:harami2000 wrote:bbarsh wrote:Out bid by Mr. 0 Feedback...http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... %3AIT&rd=1Mr. Zero Feedback who was registered back in October 2001.Took a long time to pluck up courage for their first bid on eBay, but then they decided to make it a BIG one! oh well thats EASILY out of the realms of me bidding on it
harami2000 wrote:bbarsh wrote:Out bid by Mr. 0 Feedback...http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... %3AIT&rd=1Mr. Zero Feedback who was registered back in October 2001.Took a long time to pluck up courage for their first bid on eBay, but then they decided to make it a BIG one!
bbarsh wrote:Out bid by Mr. 0 Feedback...http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... %3AIT&rd=1
harami2000 wrote:I missed the updated Qs & As Q: I am in the Phiadelphia area. Dec-14-05 A: Hello--- Thanks. I think the only team that comes close to the disaster season the Lions have had is the Eagles. HowardQ: Yes it is a legitimate bid. Dec-14-05 A: Hello--- Thanks! HowardWell, now we know!
afoolandhis$ wrote:Yeah, it's a bit of a dilemma. Whether to blow it all now, or wait for Paul's auctions. At least he's doing us the favor of letting us know before the first Fazzle auction ends.As for the Philly bidder...think about it.
bclarkie wrote:Ian, Maxwell is from Washington State, and Creep is from Missouri. Another thing I dont like are the people f*cking around in the questions with "Hi, jonb here" and the other person using my name. I suspect that someone reading this forum is really trying to mess with us now in an attempt at hoping to pick it up on the cheap. I have a pretty good suspicion I know who it is, and its not jonb.
improvstone wrote: Brian ... I am sure there a few people named Brian in the US Maybe even some of the play / collect D&D stuff.
bclarkie wrote:improvstone wrote: Brian ... I am sure there a few people named Brian in the US Maybe even some of the play / collect D&D stuff. No doubt. I just don't like the coincidences that seem to be piling up on this auction, thats all.
improvstone wrote:2. The price has not reached a point where I believe the zero bidder is having any real effect on the final price.
bclarkie wrote: Think about this, lumberjacques scan is absolutely horrible, it almost makes it look fake. Then look at the pictures of the other Fazzle that I am currently leading on. There are multiple picture, big and bright, much more attractive to particulary a newbie bidder who is not supposed to know the source of the current one is reliable. If you were really a newbie, compare both auctions without knowing the sellers and which one would you be most likely to bid on....
afoolandhis$ wrote:bclarkie wrote: Think about this, lumberjacques scan is absolutely horrible, it almost makes it look fake. Then look at the pictures of the other Fazzle that I am currently leading on. There are multiple picture, big and bright, much more attractive to particulary a newbie bidder who is not supposed to know the source of the current one is reliable. If you were really a newbie, compare both auctions without knowing the sellers and which one would you be most likely to bid on....I'm not sure I follow you here, Brian.Are you saying it's being shilled, yet the question from "Jonb" was meant to scare us off?
bclarkie wrote: See the problem.