afoolandhis$ wrote:I think I only have a 1st print, but will check when I get home.
harami2000 wrote:afoolandhis$ wrote:I think I only have a 1st print, but will check when I get home.Show off! Oh, and go fix that, Stephen... like with the Greyhawk prints
afoolandhis$ wrote:Hmmm, you're arousing my hunting instincts now...
harami2000 wrote: Now try to find an early/staff T1st GH without a pen correction to the stock list
afoolandhis$ wrote:harami2000 wrote: Now try to find an early/staff T1st GH without a pen correction to the stock list Way ahead of you there...in theory, not in practice, that is. Good luck!
harami2000 wrote:afoolandhis$ wrote:harami2000 wrote: Now try to find an early/staff T1st GH without a pen correction to the stock list Way ahead of you there...in theory, not in practice, that is. Good luck!Is not pretty, but it's genuine... [ Image ]^^
tfm wrote:After reading the comments I can see that I should have worded my query a little better. The EW in question has four staples. Does anyone else have a four?
afoolandhis$ wrote:Arrrrrrgh...so it does in fact exist.
afoolandhis$ wrote:Or wait, I know, you soaked it in rubbing alcohol, right?
tfm wrote:I was reading through my 2nd print EW and noticed that it had an extra staple in the binding. The top and the bottom staples are normal, but the middle staple only binds the cover and eight sheets of paper. The extra staple, about a half-inch lower, binds the remaining eight sheets. I was curious if anyone else had an Acaeum 2nd EW with the extra staple. If so, it could serve as another distinguishing characteristic between 1st and 2nd. If there are just a handful, then its another cousin.