stormber wrote:Howdy David,You know David, I have answered over 200 messages in the last 5 days, your's was the only 6 part, measured to the .25 mm, "oh and by the way, compare to your *other* four 1st prints" questions. To be honest I didn't think you were bidding, only that you were doing more research.I only check on the Acaeum for questions that I think are critical to the success of my auctions (when I am busy running them). Your questions seemed pedantic in relationship to the auction and, while I intended to answer them, they seemed to not be top priority during a very busy time.Sorry for my misunderstanding your intents.So whether you choose to bid or not (This thread has a lot of bidding-blackmail in it doesn't it?) I will give you the answers I would have given as a point of research anyway.
harami2000 wrote: with Mike/<IO>, before (wherever he is now... )
harami2000 wrote:Wouldn't have expected many other people to think up some of those questions, anyhow (and whether they were/are actually significant or not is still not certain). Had covered some of the points with Mike/<IO>, before (wherever he is now... )
killjoy32 wrote:harami2000 wrote: with Mike/<IO>, before (wherever he is now... )hes away building additional rooms for the museum
harami2000 wrote:killjoy32 wrote:harami2000 wrote: with Mike/<IO>, before (wherever he is now... )hes away building additional rooms for the museum *g*. Will be expecting something to rival the J. Paul Getty, then! (Noticed he hadn't purchased anything of eBay recently, either. Am sure some of that stuff must've been worth a bid )
killjoy32 wrote:well building a museum must be very time consuming and of course, you shouldnt complain as you get a free rein on your snipes
harami2000 wrote:etc., etc.*
deimos3428 wrote:harami2000 wrote:etc., etc.*ETC better not be bidding!
harami2000 wrote:killjoy32 wrote:well building a museum must be very time consuming and of course, you shouldnt complain as you get a free rein on your snipes Yeah, barring Bill, Jeff, Stephen, Mike, Brendon, John, Ian, Christophe, William, etc., etc...**n.b. list is not all-inclusive; please do not take offence if you're not mentioned.(... oh; and yourself, too! )
bclarkie wrote:No love again.
bclarkie wrote:Seriously, I have turned to the dark side(in case you hadn't noticed on the DG/PotVQ/Strategic Preview auctions ).
harami2000 wrote: Yeah, barring Bill, Jeff, Stephen, Mike, Brendon, John, Ian, Christophe, William, etc., etc...**n.b. list is not all-inclusive; please do not take offence if you're not mentioned.(... oh; and yourself, too! )
afoolandhis$ wrote:harami2000 wrote: Yeah, barring Bill, Jeff, Stephen, Mike, Brendon, John, Ian, Christophe, William, etc., etc...**n.b. list is not all-inclusive; please do not take offence if you're not mentioned.(... oh; and yourself, too! )...and...let's see...Kynan, I believe?
afoolandhis$ wrote:...and...let's see...Kynan, I believe?
bclarkie wrote:afoolandhis$ wrote:harami2000 wrote: Yeah, barring Bill, Jeff, Stephen, Mike, Brendon, John, Ian, Christophe, William, etc., etc...**n.b. list is not all-inclusive; please do not take offence if you're not mentioned.(... oh; and yourself, too! )...and...let's see...Kynan, I believe?Why does that name sound so familiar?
bclarkie wrote:Why does that name sound so familiar?
afoolandhis$ wrote:bclarkie wrote:Why does that name sound so familiar?See also:http://www.acaeum.com/DDIndexes/ModPages/B7.htmlpost-19724.html