Yama-Arashi wrote:[list]Do the RPGA modules (Riddle of Dolmen Moor, et. al.) have TSR product numbers?
Yama-Arashi wrote:Do the R series modules (To the Aid of Falx, et. al.) have TSR product numbers?
Yama-Arashi wrote:Is there really a FOR2: Drow of the Underdark which has a plain black background, instead of the black background with the embossed spiderweb pattern?
Yama-Arashi wrote:Does anyone else think that the sample adventure in the back of the basic blue book might be the most perfect adventure ever? Just me then?
Yama-Arashi wrote:If I wrote about 4 years ago that there were 2 covers to FOR1, one with an "uncrested dragon head, left facing" and another with "crested dragon head, right facing," what the hell did I mean?
Yama-Arashi wrote:Is there any internal difference between MC3: Forgotten Realms Monstrous Compendium III Appendix and the Forgotten Realms Monstrous Compendium Appendix which has the same cover art, but no MC number, and doesn't have the III on it?
bbarsh wrote:While Killjoy is clearly a scholar and a gentleman, he is incorrect on one thing. That little scenario in the Blue Book is GREAT! A great example of pizza and suds night adventuring!
Yama-Arashi wrote:Did any living soul actually open a Birthright Campaign supplement, or is every single one still mint, in shrinkwrap?
Reindeergamez wrote:Yama-Arashi wrote:Did any living soul actually open a Birthright Campaign supplement, or is every single one still mint, in shrinkwrap?No, I believe that every one ever made is still shrinkwrapped. I think they are passed back and forth through ebay from reseller, to collector to reseller kind of like a little AD&D fruitcake.
beyondthebreach wrote:There is no product code for the RPGA modules that appear in Polyhedron
killjoy32 wrote:ummmm no its a good little example but thats all imo
Yama-Arashi wrote:C'mon, Killjoy! Not even a little love for the sample adventure's exposed side view drawing of the dungeon and towers? The underground sea? Never tried to write out the rest of the levels yourself? Man, many a tree gave its life so I could scribble out inane follow-ons to that adventure... :roll:
Yama-Arashi wrote: Does anyone else think that the sample adventure in the back of the basic blue book might be the most perfect adventure ever? Just me then?
deimos3428 wrote:Reindeergamez wrote:No, I believe that every one ever made is still shrinkwrapped. I think they are passed back and forth through ebay from reseller, to collector to reseller kind of like a little AD&D fruitcake.Correct. They only printed seventeen copies, in fact. They just circulate so fast nobody notices.
Reindeergamez wrote:No, I believe that every one ever made is still shrinkwrapped. I think they are passed back and forth through ebay from reseller, to collector to reseller kind of like a little AD&D fruitcake.
blackdougal wrote:Both have the spider-web pattern, but one is embossed, the other isn't. Is there also a plain black one?
blackdougal wrote:Both have the spider-web pattern, but one is embossed, the other isn't. Is there also a plain black one?Actually, I see what you mean -- on close inspection they do both have the spiderwebbing, but the one is much fainter in the photo. The 2 versions I have both have the embossed webbing, and I think I mistook the other for having none at all. My thanks for catching that.
beyondthebreach wrote:! My mistake . . . earlier I said that there is one without the spiderweb . . . I must have done the same thing. I looked at scans I had for about ten different ones of these and only noticed the spider-web in two . . . I don't think the "light" spiderweb shows up in my pics (even when they are very large . . .)Sorry for the mis-info . . .
Yama-Arashi wrote: Does anyone else think that the sample adventure in the back of the basic blue book might be the most perfect adventure ever? Just me then? Yes, I agree! Although there is a certain bias that comes with having the Holmes "blue" basic set as your first D&D set.