mbassoc2003 wrote:I'm still on the lookout for a set of these.
harami2000 wrote:...but how many doctored dice have you seen with two 17s or 18s?
jamesmishler wrote:bbarsh wrote:I remember being at a Gencon ad&d open and rolling to hit and DM telling me I couldn't roll that way. He insisted I use a numbered d20 thinking I was somehow scamming him.I *hate* when players do that these days. The problem is that I've run into too many players who do try to scam the DM with that rolling method, by alternating what was high and low at random, hoping to catch the DM unawares and thus better able to pick a result...Of course, that's not as ballsy as the guy who thought he could roll his dice in his briefcase and not let me see the results... oy, the nerve of some players...
bbarsh wrote:I remember being at a Gencon ad&d open and rolling to hit and DM telling me I couldn't roll that way. He insisted I use a numbered d20 thinking I was somehow scamming him.
johnhuck wrote:harami2000 wrote:...but how many doctored dice have you seen with two 17s or 18s? Guilty as charged. Not that it seemed to do any good. I think that particular poly was naturally weighted towards the low numbers.
zhowar1 wrote: By the way, anyone know who coined the term "low-impact dice" or at least when it came into fashion - is it something old or relatively new?
afoolandhis$ wrote:zhowar1 wrote: By the way, anyone know who coined the term "low-impact dice" or at least when it came into fashion - is it something old or relatively new?I don't know, but would guess the term didn't exist until the term "high impact dice" arose, and had its genesis as a matter of contrast.