bclarkie wrote:A little frustrated today, can ya tell.
harami2000 wrote:deimos3428 wrote:I feel your pain. I do feel a little bad that I needlessly bumped up David's bid to $2.25... But I guess it's ok now.yep, s'OK Deimos... Code: killjoy32 ( 1351) US $749.99 Sep-27-05 12:44:58 PDT harami2000 ( 190) US $739.99 Sep-27-05 12:42:30 PDT killjoy32 ( 1351) US $739.91 Sep-27-05 12:44:47 PDT killjoy32 ( 1351) US $704.43 Sep-27-05 12:42:01 PDT harami2000 ( 190) US $689.99 Sep-27-05 12:41:23 PDT killjoy32 ( 1351) US $679.91 Sep-27-05 12:41:51 PDT killjoy32 ( 1351) US $643.99 Sep-27-05 12:39:07 PDT bombadil-tom ( 88) US $585.00 Sep-27-05 12:27:04 PDT killjoy32 ( 1351) US $541.73 Sep-27-05 12:38:57 PDT killjoy32 ( 1351) US $384.91 Sep-27-05 12:05:12 PDT harami2000 ( 190) US $98.99 Sep-27-05 12:05:50 PDT bombadil-tom ( 88) US $59.00 Sep-27-05 12:04:15 PDT harami2000 ( 190) US $5.00 Sep-27-05 11:56:40 PDT deimos3428 ( 81) US $2.00 Sep-27-05 11:58:07 PDT
deimos3428 wrote:I feel your pain. I do feel a little bad that I needlessly bumped up David's bid to $2.25... But I guess it's ok now.
killjoy32 ( 1351) US $749.99 Sep-27-05 12:44:58 PDT harami2000 ( 190) US $739.99 Sep-27-05 12:42:30 PDT killjoy32 ( 1351) US $739.91 Sep-27-05 12:44:47 PDT killjoy32 ( 1351) US $704.43 Sep-27-05 12:42:01 PDT harami2000 ( 190) US $689.99 Sep-27-05 12:41:23 PDT killjoy32 ( 1351) US $679.91 Sep-27-05 12:41:51 PDT killjoy32 ( 1351) US $643.99 Sep-27-05 12:39:07 PDT bombadil-tom ( 88) US $585.00 Sep-27-05 12:27:04 PDT killjoy32 ( 1351) US $541.73 Sep-27-05 12:38:57 PDT killjoy32 ( 1351) US $384.91 Sep-27-05 12:05:12 PDT harami2000 ( 190) US $98.99 Sep-27-05 12:05:50 PDT bombadil-tom ( 88) US $59.00 Sep-27-05 12:04:15 PDT harami2000 ( 190) US $5.00 Sep-27-05 11:56:40 PDT deimos3428 ( 81) US $2.00 Sep-27-05 11:58:07 PDT
afoolandhis$ wrote:Anybody wanna guess where this is going to end up?[ Image ]
bclarkie wrote:afoolandhis$ wrote:Anybody wanna guess where this is going to end up?[ Image ]whatever a2jeff's bid is.
bclarkie wrote:The trend continues............
harami2000 wrote:The change in how rapidly some auctions "take off" is also a relatively recent phenomenon, owing to certain bidders.Makes for an interesting combination with the "must win" mindsets towards the auctions' end.
harami2000 wrote:That's not what I meant, Stephen!
afoolandhis$ wrote:harami2000 wrote:That's not what I meant, Stephen! Sorry, couldn't resist. :lol:
deimos3428 wrote: I feel your pain. I do feel a little bad that I needlessly bumped up David's bid to $2.25... But I guess it's ok now.
deimos3428 wrote:<Censored by the Militant Organization Against Time Sabotage (MOATS)>
killjoy32 wrote:mind you, you had your fill with that R and RPGA heist the other month, so dont be greedy young clarkie
bclarkie wrote:deimos3428 wrote:<Censored by the Militant Organization Against Time Sabotage (MOATS)>Now thats funny.
harami2000 wrote:killjoy32 wrote:mind you, you had your fill with that R and RPGA heist the other month, so dont be greedy young clarkie Understatement...?Probably the largest BIN discount since Marlith and Frank's heists.
afoolandhis$ wrote:Take a look at Tyson's and Lumberjacques' recent Tsojconth auctions. You might have predicted the winning bid on Tyson's with fairly high accuracy, but Lumber's went through two irruptions, making it far more difficult - if not impossible - to predict the winning bid. So the question is, will this one follow the "Tyson model" or the "Lumber model"? I'm betting on the former.
bclarkie wrote:deimos3428 wrote: I feel your pain. I do feel a little bad that I needlessly bumped up David's bid to $2.25... But I guess it's ok now.d, is that $2.00 bid symbolic or some thing? <nudge> <nudge> deimos3428 wrote:<Censored by the Militant Organization Against Time Sabotage (MOATS)>Now thats funny.