burntwire wrote:Has anyone tried contacting Tim Kask? He may remember something.
Llaurenela wrote:Just wondering if anymore info was available.
Mister Yuk wrote in Greyhawk Reference Sheets:May need to apologize for reviving such an old Post but I thought some discussion could be useful on this since another one has come to market.I was wondering if anyone thought since this one was found in a 5th Print Box Set with a 5th Print Greyhawk that a hole may have been blown through the theory of how the GH Reference Sheets were offered originally (with purchase of a 2nd/3rd Box Set and a 1st Print GH Supplement) I think a clue is that 3 out of 4 of the Supplements have an identifying mark (W-3) written on them, but not the Sheets (not the 5th Print GH Supplement either which hurts the theory I'm trying to bring here). In my original club, one of the longest running DMs in the group had completely worn out her DMG (I wasn't aware of printings back then but it was a pre Revised Edition Print) so the group bought her a Revised Print which she was thrilled to get since it was updated. Where did her old one go, it was given away.I look at this, especially since the books are in relatively good shape and the GH Ref Sheets are definitely well used, that the Box Set was the Second Set of the person and maybe the GH Supplement too. So I figure that the theory on how the GH Ref Sheets were distributed should be considered intact. Or at least, I wouldn't consider this too heavily against any other theory made before its appearance.IMHOGREYHAWK REFERENCE SHEETS GH for DUNGEONS & DRAGONS Goldenrod 3 Pages RARE c1976 | eBay
muaddib5 wrote in Greyhawk Reference Sheets:Absent factual evidence about the books and the sheets, it's basically all theory and conjecture. The possibilities are endless how this material came together. Information from the original "avid gamer" owner may not even solve that issue (he/she may have received it all as one lot, belonged to the spouse, etc). At Gary Con last year Tim Kask mentioned that game sets were often "cobbled" together with leftovers from previous printings. I'm interested if anyone is able to verify these as actual Greyhawk Reference Sheets.
stratochamp wrote in Greyhawk Reference Sheets:They certainly look legitimate to me. I own Tim Kask's set and one from my brother-in-law that was never folded.
